Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hmaurus/masterclaudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hmaurus/masterclaude/pdir-validar-implementacao)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hmaurus/masterclaude/pdir-validar-implementacao"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hmaurus/masterclaude/pdir-validar-implementacao/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hmaurus/masterclaude/pdir-validar-implementacao"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hmaurus/masterclaude/pdir-validar-implementacao.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.01030 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00412 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00206 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
pdir-validar-implementacao scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 134 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PDIR: Validar Implementação
Valida se a implementação atende à demanda original, documenta o que foi feito e atualiza o progresso do projeto. Pode ser usado após qualquer abordagem de implementação (plan-mode nativo, feature branch, correção manual).
Em qualquer passo, se algo falhar ou faltar informação, informe o erro e pergunte ao usuário como prosseguir.
Processar $ARGUMENTS
Extrair do $ARGUMENTS:
- Fonte da demanda: identificar o tipo:
- Número (ex:
42) → Issue do GitHub - Caminho de arquivo (ex:
docs/projeto/specs/spec-paywall.md) → arquivo local - Texto → descrição livre
- Número (ex:
Se vazio: perguntar ao usuário qual a fonte da demanda.
Instruções
1. Obter Escopo da Demanda
Se Issue GitHub:
gh issue view [número] --json number,title,body,comments
Analisar o body e todos os comentários.
Se arquivo .md: ler o arquivo completo.
Se descrição livre: usar o texto.
2. CI — Checks Automatizados
Consultar package.json, Makefile ou equivalente para identificar os comandos disponíveis. Executar:
- Lint
- Type-check
- Testes
Se algum check falhar, reportar no relatório mas continuar a validação.
3. Spec Check — Verificação contra o Escopo
Reler a fonte da demanda e verificar item por item se cada ponto foi atendido na implementação. Para cada item:
- Verificar se o código implementa o comportamento descrito
- Verificar se edge cases mencionados foram tratados
4. Smoke Test — Verificação Visual
Navegar pelas rotas afetadas pela implementação:
- Verificar se não há erros no console
- Verificar se o comportamento está correto visualmente
- Verificar se rotas existentes continuam funcionando
5. Relatório
Validação concluída!
Fonte: [#número - título | arquivo | descrição]
## CI
- Lint: [passou | falhou — detalhes]
- Type-check: [passou | falhou — detalhes]
- Testes: [passou | falhou — detalhes]
## Spec Check
- [item 1]: [atendido | não atendido — detalhes]
- [item 2]: [atendido | não atendido — detalhes]
## Smoke Test
- [rota 1]: [ok | erro — detalhes]
- [rota 2]: [ok | erro — detalhes]
## Resultado
[Tudo ok | Há itens pendentes — ver detalhes acima]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 134 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 873e8c7646d4
pdir-validar-implementacao is a command published in the GitHub repository hmaurus/masterclaude (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 1,030 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
prototype
You are building a proof-of-concept for the current Grainulator sprint. Read CLAUDE.md for sprint context and claims.json for existing research claims.
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
verify
Run repository verification using the verification-loop skill.
modernize-transform
Transform one legacy module to the target stack — idiomatic rewrite with behavior-equivalence tests.
constraints
A command for defining a project's quality standards through a short interview and a written CONSTRAINTS.md file. It records checks, thresholds, exceptions, and commands for enforcing them.
test-coverage
Analyze test coverage and identify the highest-value gaps to fill.