Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/hmj1026/dhpk/codex-test-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hmj1026/dhpkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hmj1026/dhpk/codex-test-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hmj1026/dhpk/codex-test-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hmj1026/dhpk/codex-test-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00133 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00067 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00027 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
codex-test-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to check-coverage — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Deprecated forwarding alias. For this minor release, run:
/dhpk:codex-review --scope tests --coverage --depth full $ARGUMENTS
Compatibility boundary
This explicit-only alias is retained for legacy callers; new work uses the canonical target.
See the alias contract; preserve the target, flags, and $ARGUMENTS.
Completion: propagate the target's exit status and report its PASS/FAIL/verdict evidence.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 16 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A ea484cab2ee3
codex-test-review is a command published in the GitHub repository hmj1026/dhpk (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 133 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to check-coverage, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
octo-loop
Your first output line MUST be: 🐙 Octopus Loop Mode.
cloudflare-workers:test-setup
Interactive Vitest setup wizard for Cloudflare Workers testing. Configures @cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers, mocks bindings, and creates example tests.
improve-test-quality
Analyze and improve existing test quality with better assertions, coverage, and maintainability.
init
在既有專案初始化 Octopus——摸專案、檢查 OpenSpec CLI 與結構（缺則引導安裝）、盤點 change 狀態、建 Arena、出交接報告。每個專案跑一次。.
sdlc-test
Generate and run multi-tiered enterprise test suites (Unit, Integration, E2E, Contract, Load/k6, Chaos, and Fuzz testing).
fuzz
Generate property-based fuzz tests for a specific function.