Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/dev-fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/dev-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/dev-fix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/dev-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/dev-fix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01488 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00744 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00298 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00149 |
Grade A, and why
dev-fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 171 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dev Fix
Unified developer workflow for fixing bugs. Analyzes issue-tracker context, cross-checks docs/code, proposes a solution, implements the fix, verifies locally, and delivers a PR/MR.
Input: $ARGUMENTS
Optional args: slug=, ticket=<id/url>, mode=interactive|autonomous|channel, channel=, auto_continue=true|false, profile=business|hybrid|technical.
Instructions
Execute the following steps for $ARGUMENTS.
Dev-Fix — Bug Remediation
Goal: Take a bug ticket from root-cause analysis through a locally-verified PR/MR, enforcing a strict Propose -> Approve -> Verify cycle.
Input
/dev-fix <issue-url-or-key>
Workflow
Step 0: Environment Prep (Turbo)
// turbo
- Sync Registry:
git pull origin mainin the standard repo.
Step 1: Research & Discovery (Implementation Plan Phase)
[!TIP] Sub-Agent Delegation: If your platform supports sub-agents, delegate ticket extraction to
specialist-jira-analystand context lookup tospecialist-codebase-scout. If sub-agents are NOT supported, execute these steps yourself.
- Analyze Ticket: Use installed Jira/GitHub/GitLab/ADO MCP first; otherwise use exported ticket text. Extract
Reproduce steps,Expected Result, andActual Result. - Cross-Check Context: Use knowledge-base MCP when configured; otherwise use local code search. Locate relevant code.
- Create Implementation Plan:
- Use the Implementation Plan Template below.
- Initialize project-local
docs/prd/prd-plan-[slug].md. - Goal: Clear description of the root cause.
- Proposed Changes: Exact files and logic to be modified.
- Verification Plan: Detail which QE skill will be used to verify the fix locally before PR.
- Do not propose code changes until repro steps, expected result, and root cause hypothesis are explicit.
- HARD STOP: Request user approval for the implementation plan.
- Readiness Gate: Run
implementation-readiness; code only after READY or approved PARTIAL.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 171 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 04488156e14b
dev-fix is a command published in the GitHub repository HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard (565 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,488 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
debug
Structured bug diagnosis and fixing workflow that reproduces, diagnoses root cause, applies a minimal fix, writes regression tests, and scans for similar patterns.
scm
SCM workflow for Git operations (branching/merge/conflict/worktree) plus Conventional Commit execution.
fix-issue
A command that takes a GitHub Issue—a tracked bug, request, or question—and guides its fix from investigation through testing and submission. TDD means writing a failing test first, then changing the code until the test passes.
hotfix
An emergency software-fix workflow that moves directly from development to verification and Git commit, skipping the usual planning and design stages.
incident
An incident-response assistant for guiding work when a software service has a serious failure or disruption.
pr
A pull-request workflow assistant for preparing and handling proposed code changes before they are merged.