verify-bug

verify-bug is a command for Claude Code from HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard. It costs 0 tokens per session (1,222 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A post-merge user-acceptance check for a bug fix that follows reproduction steps and compares the result before and after the change. UAT means testing the change in an environment that represents real user use.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to verify merged bug fixes in UAT, gather comparative evidence, and update the related ticket status.
Why use it?
It confirms that the reported problem is actually fixed and that the fix did not merely look correct in development. It records evidence before updating the ticket.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution. Also seen: mentions subagents; mentions OpenCode.

Good fit Use it to verify merged bug fixes in UAT, gather comparative evidence, and update the related ticket status.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/verify-bug
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for verify-bug

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/verify-bug/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/verify-bug)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/verify-bug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/verify-bug/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for verify-bug

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/verify-bug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard/verify-bug.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,222 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.01222
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00611
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00244
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00122

Measured 8d ago against content hash 1660b73a2fa6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

verify-bug scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/verify-bug.md · 119 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Verify Bug

Post-merge UAT verification workflow. Walks JIRA reproduce steps, performs comparative audits (Before/After), attaches evidence to JIRA, and transitions status on PASS.

Input: $ARGUMENTS

Optional args: slug=, ticket=<id/url>, mode=interactive|autonomous|channel, channel=, auto_continue=true|false, profile=business|hybrid|technical.

Instructions

Execute the following steps for $ARGUMENTS.

Verify-Bug — UAT Audit

Goal: Prove a bug fix works in the UAT environment via comparative Before/After evidence, then transition ticket status.

Input

/verify-bug <jira-url-or-key> [--baseline-image <url>]

Workflow

Step 0: Pre-flight & Data Gathering

[!TIP] Sub-Agent Delegation: If your platform supports sub-agents (e.g., Claude, OpenCode, Gemini, Kiro), delegate steps 1-3 below to your JIRA Analyst sub-agent (e.g., @specialist-jira-analyst). If sub-agents are NOT supported (e.g., Antigravity, Windsurf), you must execute these steps yourself.

  1. Parse JIRA: Extract Market, Reproduce steps, and Expected Result.
  2. Resolve Markets: If multiple markets, prompt for scope (Full/Sample/Custom).
  3. Fetch Test Data: Call Confluence for Test data - <MARKET> UAT. Parse credentials and module-specific data (e.g., customer codes).
  4. Credential Check: Rule out expired accounts before starting sessions.
  5. Fallback: If Jira/Confluence MCPs are unavailable, request exported ticket/test-data text and continue with local evidence.

Step 1: Comparative Audit (Execution Phase)

For each market in scope:

  1. Environment Setup: Run the DNS probe from <SKILLS>/common/common-web-visual-testing/references/diagnostic-decoder.md; if it indicates VPN is required, connect VPN and retry.
  2. Named Session: Start playwright-cli -s={TICKET}-{MARKET} or Appium session.
  3. Walk Steps: Execute reproduction steps.
    • Hover Discipline: Always hover the target element (warning, button, price) before screenshotting.
    • Stability: Disable animations and mask dynamic fields (clocks, balances).
  4. Verdict Determination:
    • PASS: End-state matches Expected Result.
    • FAIL: End-state matches Actual Result or original bug screenshot.
    • NEEDS-HUMAN: Deviates from both.

Read the full file on GitHub · 119 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 119 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 1660b73a2fa6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

verify-bug is a command published in the GitHub repository HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard (565 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,222 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.