NodeBenchAI: Command for Claude Code

.claude/commands/nodebench-qa.md

nodebench-qa is a command for Claude Code from HomenShum/NodeBenchAI. It costs 0 tokens per session (301 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A website quality-checking workflow that crawls pages, lists problems, suggests tests, checks proposed fixes, and compares the results. Crawling means automatically visiting pages to inspect them.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after implementation work or before release to inspect a site, generate test scenarios, re-crawl after fixes, and report measured savings.
Why use it?
It turns a site review into a repeatable before-and-after process instead of stopping at an initial list of issues.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is HomenShum/NodeBenchAI's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on NodeBenchAI itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything NodeBenchAI configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to HomenShum/NodeBenchAI. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/HomenShum/NodeBenchAI/main/.claude/commands/nodebench-qa.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HomenShum/NodeBenchAI

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for nodebench-qa

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/homenshum/nodebenchai/nodebench-qa/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/homenshum/nodebenchai/nodebench-qa)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/homenshum/nodebenchai/nodebench-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/homenshum/nodebenchai/nodebench-qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for nodebench-qa

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/homenshum/nodebenchai/nodebench-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/homenshum/nodebenchai/nodebench-qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 301 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00301
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00120
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00060
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00030

Measured 1mo ago against content hash cd68d5615ffd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

nodebench-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/nodebench-qa.md · 40 lines

What it actually says

NodeBench QA Loop

Full QA loop: crawl → findings → fix suggestions → re-crawl → savings report.

Steps

  1. Crawl the site Call site_map({ url: '<target-url>' }) to crawl all pages and get a session ID.

  2. Review findings Call site_map({ session_id: '<id>', action: 'findings' }) to see all QA issues.

  3. Generate test suggestions Call suggest_tests({ session_id: '<id>' }) to get scenario-based test cases.

  4. Fix issues For each finding, trace the root cause (5-whys) and apply minimal targeted fixes.

  5. Re-crawl and diff Call diff_crawl({ url: '<target-url>', baseline_id: '<original-session-id>' }) to compare before/after.

  6. Report savings Call compare_savings() to show token usage, time saved, and cost estimates.

Quick one-liner

If you have a running dev server:

site_map({ url: 'http://localhost:5191' })

Then follow the next suggestions in the response to drill down.

When to use

  • After completing any implementation sprint
  • Before any deploy or PR
  • When the user says "QA", "check the site", "run quality checks"
  • As part of the continuous flywheel loop
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A cd68d5615ffd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

nodebench-qa is a command published in the GitHub repository HomenShum/NodeBenchAI (15 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 301 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.