Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/huaweicloud/huaweicloud-devkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/huaweicloud/huaweicloud-devkit/huaweicloud-doctor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/huaweicloud/huaweicloud-devkit/huaweicloud-doctor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/huaweicloud/huaweicloud-devkit/huaweicloud-doctor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/huaweicloud/huaweicloud-devkit/huaweicloud-doctor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/huaweicloud/huaweicloud-devkit/huaweicloud-doctor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00186 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00093 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00037 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
huaweicloud-doctor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Use HuaweiCloud DevKit tools and skills to perform a comprehensive readiness check:
- Check if KooCLI
hcloudis installed:huaweicloud_check_cli. If not, guide user to install. - Check if hcloud has active credentials:
hcloud configure list(redacted). - List installed skills via
huaweicloud_search_docsor count directories in~/.config/opencode/skills/. - Verify MCP server is reachable by calling any read-only tool.
- Summarize: installed (OK) vs missing (action needed).
- Do not print AK/SK, tokens, passwords, credential files, or raw profile secrets.
If MCP tools are unavailable (fresh install), run npx huaweicloud-devkit doctor in terminal.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed d9fa9fd10d67
- 12d ago First seen · 15 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 578ab70628ca
huaweicloud-doctor is a command published in the GitHub repository huaweicloud/huaweicloud-devkit (47 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 186 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
atomic-plan
Write a design doc (concepts, business rules, approaches) and a checkpoint-table spec (contract) for non-trivial work; inline spec only for trivial. Gauges triviality; loops spec authoring with subagents. Human-facing artifact, Mermaid diagrams allowed.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
session-report
Capture what changed this session and why, scoped to the current branch. Read by ship verbs when synthesizing the commit message; deleted after a successful commit.
advanced-code-review-context
Advanced Code Review Phase 2: Context Analysis - load previous reviews, PR history, declined items.
crystallize-verify
Adversarial review of a crystallized document against its original. Use when crystallize.md invokes pre-delivery verification. Receives original + crystallized documents; returns PASS or FAIL with findings.
code-review-give
Give mode for code-review: Review someone else's code with multi-pass analysis and structured recommendations.