file-review

file-review is a command for Claude Code from huurray/fe-review-agents. It costs 69 tokens per session (933 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command that reviews one frontend source file through several specialized reviewers and combines their findings into one report. The report can be written in Korean or English and filtered by issue severity.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing a specified frontend file with separate checks for performance, quality, bugs, TypeScript, and accessibility, then sorting the findings by importance.
Why use it?
It reduces the chance that bugs, performance problems, type-safety issues, accessibility problems, or code-quality concerns are missed in a single-file review.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Part of the fe-review-agents plugin — 2 commands, 7 agents shipped together

Good fit Reviewing a specified frontend file with separate checks for performance, quality, bugs, TypeScript, and accessibility, then sorting the findings by importance.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/huurray/fe-review-agents/file-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/huurray/fe-review-agents

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install fe-review-agents, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 commands, 7 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for file-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/huurray/fe-review-agents/file-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/huurray/fe-review-agents/file-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/huurray/fe-review-agents/file-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/huurray/fe-review-agents/file-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for file-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/huurray/fe-review-agents/file-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/huurray/fe-review-agents/file-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 69 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 933 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00069 $0.00933
Opus 5 $0.00034 $0.00466
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00187
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00093

Measured 10d ago against content hash a33cbf0817e1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

file-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/file-review.md · 80 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

단일 파일 다각도 리뷰. 여러 reviewer + synthesizer.

단계 0 — 인자 파싱

$ARGUMENTS에서 다음 두 옵션 토큰을 먼저 추출:

  • lang=ko|en (기본 ko)
  • severity_min=LOW|MED|HIGH|CRITICAL (기본 LOW. 대소문자 무시 — 내부적으로 대문자로 정규화)

각 토큰의 값이 위 허용 목록에 없으면 default로 fallback하고 사용자에게 한 줄 경고를 그대로 출력 (예: severity_min=foo`는 무효 — `LOW`로 진행). 두 토큰을 제거한 나머지를 파일 경로로 사용.

만약 파일 경로가 비어있다면, 사용자에게 어떤 파일을 리뷰할지 먼저 물어본 뒤 진행하세요.

리뷰 대상 파일을 <FILE_PATH>로 지칭합니다.

단계 1 — 모든 reviewer를 병렬로 호출

반드시 하나의 어시스턴트 메시지 안에, 아래 나열된 모든 Agent 도구 호출을 한꺼번에 보내야 합니다. (순차 호출 금지)

각 reviewer에 다음 형식의 prompt를 전달 (<LANG>은 단계 0에서 결정한 언어):

파일 `<FILE_PATH>`를 [관점] 관점에서 리뷰하세요. (파일 모드 — Read 도구로 파일을 직접 읽으세요)

lang=<LANG>

각 호출의 정확한 파라미터:

  1. Agentsubagent_type: reviewer-react-perf, description: "Perf review", [관점]="성능"
  2. Agentsubagent_type: reviewer-quality, description: "Quality review", [관점]="코드 품질"
  3. Agentsubagent_type: reviewer-bugs, description: "Bugs review", [관점]="잠재 버그"
  4. Agentsubagent_type: reviewer-ts, description: "TS review", [관점]="TypeScript 타입 안전성"
  5. Agentsubagent_type: reviewer-a11y, description: "A11y review", [관점]="웹 접근성"
  6. Agentsubagent_type: reviewer-security, description: "Security review", [관점]="보안"

중요: 위 subagent_type 이름을 정확히 그대로 사용하세요. general-purpose로 폴백하지 마세요.

단계 2 — synthesizer 호출

모든 reviewer 결과가 돌아오면 마지막으로 synthesizer를 한 번 더 Agent로 호출:

  • subagent_type: synthesizer
  • description: "Synthesize review"
  • prompt: 다음 형식으로 모든 reviewer 결과를 포함 (<LANG>은 단계 0에서 결정한 언어, <SEVERITY_MIN>은 단계 0에서 결정한 최소 심각도):
    파일 경로: <FILE_PATH>
    lang=<LANG>
    severity_min=<SEVERITY_MIN>
    
    모든 reviewer의 결과를 종합해 중요도순 리포트를 작성해주세요.
    
    ## 1. Performance
    <reviewer-react-perf 출력 전문>
    
    ## 2. Code Quality
    <reviewer-quality 출력 전문>
    
    ## 3. Bugs
    <reviewer-bugs 출력 전문>
    
    ## 4. TypeScript
    <reviewer-ts 출력 전문>
    
    ## 5. Accessibility
    <reviewer-a11y 출력 전문>
    
    ## 6. Security
    <reviewer-security 출력 전문>
    

단계 3 — 사용자에게 출력

synthesizer가 반환한 마크다운 리포트를 그대로 사용자에게 보여주세요. 추가 설명/요약/메타 코멘트 금지.

Read the full file on GitHub · 80 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 80 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A a33cbf0817e1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

file-review is a command published in the GitHub repository huurray/fe-review-agents (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 933 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.