Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Hwiyeon/claude-sisyphus-grad. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Hwiyeon/claude-sisyphus-grad/main/.claude/commands/review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Hwiyeon/claude-sisyphus-gradWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hwiyeon/claude-sisyphus-grad/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hwiyeon/claude-sisyphus-grad/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hwiyeon/claude-sisyphus-grad/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hwiyeon/claude-sisyphus-grad/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hwiyeon/claude-sisyphus-grad/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00557 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00223 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Standalone Review Command
Runs the multi-agent review pipeline independently on experiment results.
Can be used standalone outside the /train loop; performs a one-time review without ralph-loop integration.
Usage
/review results=path/to/experiment_N.json detail=path/to/experiment_N_detail.md [review_cycles=1] [config=...] [script=...]
Arguments
| argument | description | default |
|---|---|---|
results |
path to experiment result JSON file | required |
detail |
path to experiment detail MD file | required |
review_cycles |
number of G→round2→round3→Judge cycle repetitions | 1 |
config |
config file path (passed to reviewers as reference) | optional |
script |
training script path (passed to reviewers as reference) | optional |
| lang | output language for review output (ko, en, etc.). The project's CLAUDE.md defines the default | project default |
Procedure
Step 1: Parse and Validate Arguments
Parse arguments from $ARGUMENTS.
- Verify that
resultsanddetailfiles exist
- Infer metric cache path:
cache/metric_cache.jsonlin the same session directory asdetailfile
- Print parsed values for user confirmation
Step 2: Load Review Pipeline Module
Read .claude/prompts/train-review-pipeline.md to load review rules.
Step 3: Run Review
Run multi-agent review per train-review-pipeline.md rules:
- Input mapping:
experiment_n: extracted from filename (e.g.,experiment_3.json→ 3)detail_file:detailargumentresults_file:resultsargument
metric_cache: inferred path (skip if not found)
review_cycles: argument valueconfig,script: argument values (not passed to reviewers if absent)
Step 4: Output Results
- Output Judge decision directly to user
- No
session_continuation.jsonmanipulation - No ralph-loop integration
- Review content is recorded in the
detailfile (handled by the review pipeline scribe)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 71 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 091a509bfee8
review is a command published in the GitHub repository Hwiyeon/claude-sisyphus-grad (58 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 557 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
review compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reviewHwiyeon/claude-sisyphus-grad | Command | 58 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |