Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hyhmrright/logic-lensWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hyhmrright/logic-lens/logic-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hyhmrright/logic-lens/logic-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hyhmrright/logic-lens/logic-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hyhmrright/logic-lens/logic-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hyhmrright/logic-lens/logic-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00054 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00027 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00011 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00005 |
Grade A, and why
logic-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Use the Skill tool to invoke logic-lens:logic-review, then follow its instructions exactly. $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 7 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A eeeea00cd09d
logic-review is a command published in the GitHub repository hyhmrright/logic-lens (22 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 54 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
verify
Verify code, architecture, or bug fixes using Chain-of-Verification.
debug
Systematic debugging: root cause before any fix, one hypothesis at a time, and a three-strikes rule that questions the architecture instead of stacking patches.
lint
The canonical linter per ecosystem over your changes: findings are diagnoses you judge, fix, or explain.
pr
Prepare and open a pull request the senior way: gate, template, scrubbed, everything visible.
plan
Turn an approved spec into an implementation plan an engineer with zero context could execute — with a quality controller that blocks placeholders and hollow tasks.
audit
Onboard an existing codebase: every domain's checks over the whole tree, then a triaged plan to bring it in line.