Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hypnguyen1209/offensive-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude/engage.install)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude/engage.install"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude/engage.install/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude/engage.install"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude/engage.install.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.01112 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00556 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00222 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
engage.install scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 183 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/engage.install
Executes Phase 5 (Installation/Persistence) of the engagement workflow.
Usage
/engage.install [--method <persistence-method>]
Options:
--method: Specify persistence method (service, cron, startup, registry, implant)
Process
1. Load Templates
Loads:
install/persistence-mechanism.md— Persistence design and implementationinstall/cleanup-plan.md— Cleanup and removal procedures
2. Environment Assessment
Before installing persistence:
- Identify current access level and user context
- Enumerate installed security controls (AV, EDR, HIDS)
- Identify available persistence locations
- Assess detection risk for each method
3. Persistence Method Selection
Choose method based on target environment and OPSEC requirements:
Linux Methods:
- Cron job (user or system level)
- Systemd service or timer
- Bashrc/profile modification
- SSH authorized_keys
- Kernel module (requires root)
- LD_PRELOAD hijacking
Windows Methods:
- Registry run keys
- Scheduled task
- Windows service
- WMI event subscription
- DLL hijacking/side-loading
- COM object hijacking
- Startup folder
Cross-Platform Methods:
- Web shell
- Implant with auto-reconnect
- Backdoored application binary
4. Implementation
Documents in persistence-mechanism.md:
Persistence Details:
- Method selected and justification
- Installation location (path, registry key, etc.)
- Execution trigger (boot, login, scheduled, event-based)
- Payload stored/dropped
- Expected behavior after installation
Stealth Considerations:
- File timestamps (timestomp if needed)
- Log suppression or cleanup
- AV/EDR evasion for persistence mechanism
- Naming conventions (blend with legitimate entries)
- Digital signatures (if applicable)
5. Verification
After installation:
- Verify persistence survives reboot/relogin
- Confirm callback to C2
- Test failover and recovery
- Monitor for security alerts
6. Cleanup Plan
Populates cleanup-plan.md with:
Cleanup Steps (ordered):
- Exact commands to remove persistence
- Files to delete
- Registry keys to remove
- Services to stop and delete
- Logs to review for artifacts
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 183 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A d850f9fe70c1
engage.install is a command published in the GitHub repository hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude (357 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 1,112 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
discover
Run a full product discovery cycle — from outcome definition through opportunity mapping, prioritisation, and experiment design. Use when the team isn't sure what to build next, or before writing a PRD for a complex feature space.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
claude-tracker
List recent Claude Code sessions with live status.
qa
Smoke or browser-walk a running app. Report only. Do not implement. Do not merge.
esp-harden
Harden and inspect ESP32 firmware for field failures, crashes, memory, and security.
replication-package
Scaffold or audit a social-science replication package at a target directory, and audit the manuscript and its archived research objects against FAIR principles.