Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hypnguyen1209/offensive-claudenpx agentmods add commands/hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude/engage.reconWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude/engage.recon)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude/engage.recon"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude/engage.recon/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude/engage.recon"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude/engage.recon.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00994 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00497 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00199 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
engage.recon scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/engage.recon
Executes Phase 1 (Reconnaissance) of the engagement workflow.
Usage
/engage.recon [--passive-only] [--active]
Options:
--passive-only: Only passive reconnaissance (no direct target interaction)--active: Include active scanning (default if authorized in scope)
Process
1. Load Templates
Loads:
recon/recon-plan.md— Reconnaissance methodologyrecon/attack-surface.md— Attack surface map template
1.5 Prior-Intel Recall (engagement-memory)
Query the cross-engagement pattern memory for techniques that already worked against this
target's class / tech stack, and write them to .engage/recon/prior-intel.md so weaponization
starts from proven TTPs instead of re-deriving them:
python skills/engagement-memory/scripts/pattern_db.py match \
--target <host> --tech-stack <stack> --top 10 --json > .engage/recon/prior-intel.json
2. Passive Reconnaissance
Executes in order:
Subdomain Enumeration:
- Certificate transparency logs (crt.sh)
- DNS enumeration (subfinder, amass)
- Search engine dorking
- Historical DNS records
OSINT Gathering:
- WHOIS information
- Company information (LinkedIn, Crunchbase)
- Email addresses and naming conventions
- Technology stack identification (BuiltWith, Wappalyzer)
- GitHub/GitLab repository discovery
- Pastebin/leak searches
Infrastructure Mapping:
- ASN and IP range identification
- Cloud provider detection (AWS/Azure/GCP)
- CDN and WAF detection
3. Active Reconnaissance
If authorized:
Port Scanning:
- Full TCP port scan on discovered hosts
- Service version detection
- OS fingerprinting
Service Enumeration:
- HTTP/HTTPS service discovery
- Banner grabbing
- SSL/TLS configuration analysis
Web Application Fingerprinting:
- CMS detection (WordPress, Drupal, etc.)
- Framework identification
- JavaScript library analysis
- API endpoint discovery
4. Attack Surface Mapping
Populates recon/attack-surface.md with:
- Discovered subdomains and hosts
- Open ports and services
- Web applications and entry points
- Identified technologies and versions
- Potential attack vectors
- High-value targets
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 148 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 2f22498d68ca
engage.recon is a command published in the GitHub repository hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude (357 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 994 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
discover
Run a full product discovery cycle — from outcome definition through opportunity mapping, prioritisation, and experiment design. Use when the team isn't sure what to build next, or before writing a PRD for a complex feature space.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
claude-tracker
List recent Claude Code sessions with live status.
qa
Smoke or browser-walk a running app. Report only. Do not implement. Do not merge.
esp-harden
Harden and inspect ESP32 firmware for field failures, crashes, memory, and security.
replication-package
Scaffold or audit a social-science replication package at a target directory, and audit the manuscript and its archived research objects against FAIR principles.