Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/idoforgod/Dissertation-Simulator-AgenticWorkflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/idoforgod/dissertation-simulator-agenticworkflow/thesis-evaluate-srcs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/idoforgod/dissertation-simulator-agenticworkflow/thesis-evaluate-srcs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/idoforgod/dissertation-simulator-agenticworkflow/thesis-evaluate-srcs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/idoforgod/dissertation-simulator-agenticworkflow/thesis-evaluate-srcs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/idoforgod/dissertation-simulator-agenticworkflow/thesis-evaluate-srcs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00231 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00092 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00046 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
thesis-evaluate-srcs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Thesis SRCS Evaluation
This is an alias for /thesis:srcs. See that command for full protocol.
Protocol
- Collect all claim files from wave-results/
- Run
compute_srcs_scores.pyfor deterministic axes (CS, VS) - Run LLM evaluation for semantic axes (GS, US)
- Compute weighted SRCS score per claim type
- Flag claims below threshold (75)
- Generate srcs-summary.json report
SRCS Axes
| Axis | Weight (EMPIRICAL) | Type |
|---|---|---|
| CS (Citation Score) | 0.35 | Deterministic (P1) |
| GS (Grounding Score) | 0.35 | LLM evaluation |
| US (Uncertainty Score) | 0.10 | LLM evaluation |
| VS (Verifiability Score) | 0.20 | Deterministic (P1) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 25 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A bf7a26d7ec66
thesis-evaluate-srcs is a command published in the GitHub repository idoforgod/Dissertation-Simulator-AgenticWorkflow (108 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 231 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
verify-math
Verify a self-authored mathematical result end to end by routing claims across adversarial review, numerical falsification, symbolic or CAS checks, and Lean, then aggregating one report. Use when a theorem, proposition, conjecture, or paper-wide mathematical argument needs the appropriate combination of verification…
diff
Quantitative volume comparison between a CadQuery model and a reference STEP file.
simulation-calibrator
Test and refine simulation accuracy with validation loops, bias detection, and continuous improvement frameworks.
arg-diagram
ARG academic-paper diagram mode — standalone structural & conceptual diagram generation.
plot
Publication Polish. Runs after results-analysis (Phase 7). Audits all tables and figures produced in Phases 4–7, upgrades them to top-journal standards by calling the table and figure skills.
graphite-morphology-classify
Classify graphite in a cast-iron micrograph per ASTM A247 / ISO 945-1, quantify nodularity, and read the matrix — the single most diagnostic observation in a cast-iron case.