Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/ihatesea69/kiro-kit/lintgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ihatesea69/kiro-kitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00104 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00052 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00021 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00010 |
Grade A, and why
lint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Workflow
- Run ESLint on source files:
npx eslint . --ext .ts,.js - Run Prettier check:
npx prettier --check . - Run TypeScript type check:
npx tsc --noEmit - Report results with error counts and fix suggestions
- If
--fixflag passed, auto-fix what is possible
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 12 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 93ebe7313b26
lint is a command published in the GitHub repository ihatesea69/kiro-kit (18 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 104 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
phase-0-discovery
Understand the organization, its industry, its constraints, and its goals before touching any code. Present these questions conversationally, not as a checklist. Follow up based on answers.
phase-1-codebase-analysis
Read the actual source code and produce a factual technical assessment of each application. No recommendations yet — purely diagnostic.
phase-3-target-architecture
Propose the future-state architecture based on Phases 0-2. Expect multiple revision cycles.
phase-4-modernization-plan
Turn the target architecture into an actionable, phased implementation plan.
phase-5-supporting-docs
Produce documents for stakeholders beyond the technical team.
phase-2-pain-points
Understand what the current system fails to do from the users' perspective. The codebase tells you what the system does. The users tell you what it doesn't do.