Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ihorkatkov/pantheonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ihorkatkov/pantheon/update)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ihorkatkov/pantheon/update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ihorkatkov/pantheon/update/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ihorkatkov/pantheon/update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ihorkatkov/pantheon/update.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00615 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00246 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
update scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/update
You are merging upstream Pantheon updates into this workspace while preserving user customizations.
Context
The user ran make update which:
- Added
pantheon-upstreamremote pointing togithub.com/ihorkatkov/pantheon - Fetched the latest
pantheon-upstream/main - Detected a version mismatch between local and upstream
.pantheon-version - Launched you to perform the intelligent merge
What You Do
Step 1: Understand What Changed
Compare local vs upstream:
git diff HEAD...pantheon-upstream/main --stat
git diff HEAD...pantheon-upstream/main
Categorize changes:
- Agent updates:
.opencode/agents/*.md - Command updates:
.opencode/commands/*.md - Skill updates:
.opencode/skills/** - CLI updates:
pt,setup-worktree,Makefile - Config updates:
.opencode/opencode.jsonc - Doc updates:
README.md,docs/
Step 2: Identify User Customizations
Check which files the user has modified:
# Files user has changed since initial clone/last update
git log --all --diff-filter=M --name-only --pretty=format: -- .opencode/ pt setup-worktree Makefile | sort -u
Read current versions of modified files to understand user customizations.
Step 3: Merge Strategy
For each changed file:
Unmodified by user → Apply upstream change directly (overwrite with upstream version)
Modified by user → Smart merge:
- If upstream changed mythology/role sections and user changed project-specific sections → merge both
- If both changed the same section → present both versions to the user and ask which to keep
- If user added new content that upstream doesn't touch → preserve user additions
New upstream files → Add directly
Deleted upstream files → Remove (notify user if they had modifications)
Step 4: Apply Changes
- Apply non-conflicting changes
- Present conflicts for user resolution
- Update
.pantheon-versionto the upstream version
Step 5: Verify
- Ensure all agent files are valid markdown with frontmatter
- Ensure no merge artifacts (
<<<<<<<,=======,>>>>>>>) - Report: what was updated, what was preserved, what needs user attention
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 79 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 85979130ad97
update is a command published in the GitHub repository ihorkatkov/pantheon (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 615 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
release-notes
Generate consistent, well-structured release notes from git history. Triggered on release tags following semver patterns (v..) to produce categorized changelog with breaking changes, features, fixes, and contributor attribution.
commit
A command that examines staged Git changes and proposes a commit message using the Conventional Commits format, such as feat, fix, or docs. Git is a tool for tracking changes to code.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
doctor
Diagnosticar y reparar problemas del framework Don Cheli, git y entorno. Usa cuando el usuario dice "doctor", "problemas del framework", "don cheli no funciona", "repair Don Cheli", "debug setup", "setup broken", "framework broken", "reparar entorno". Detecta y repara issues de configuración, git y dependencias…
release-plan
A release-planning command for a software change. It documents the release scope, rollback plan, gradual or full rollout, and monitoring before waiting for human approval.