agentmods.dev

ai-coding-blueprint: Command for Claude Code

.claude/commands/review.md

review is a command for Claude Code from ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint. It costs 13 tokens per session (341 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A senior-engineer code review command for changed files or a specified target. It examines simplicity, clarity, consistency with project rules, correctness, and common edge cases, then runs the project's checks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a Git diff or selected files for bugs, unnecessary complexity, unclear names, inconsistent patterns, and missing handling for empty, loading, error, or long-content cases.
Why use it?
It provides an independent pass over code before it is considered finished. It calls out concrete problems with file and line references rather than only giving a general opinion.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md.

This is ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on ai-coding-blueprint itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything ai-coding-blueprint configures →

not rated 2repo 1mo ago A scan 13 tokens original MIT
View source ↗ ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint
Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint/main/.claude/commands/review.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint/review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 13 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 341 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00013 $0.00341
Opus 5.5 $0.00005 $0.00136
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00068
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00034

Measured 1mo ago against content hash b41b7f008359, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/review.md · 56 lines

What it actually says

Review

Review code as a senior engineer would.

Target

$ARGUMENTS

If no target is specified, review all changed files (git diff HEAD --name-only plus untracked files under the source folder named in CLAUDE.md).

Instructions

Read CLAUDE.md and .ai/PROJECT.md first. Then look at the code and ask:

Simplicity

  • Is this over-engineered?
  • Could it be shorter without losing clarity?
  • Are there unnecessary abstractions?

Clarity

  • Are names descriptive?
  • Is the logic easy to follow?
  • Would a new teammate understand this?

Consistency

  • Does it match CLAUDE.md § Conventions and § Architecture?
  • Does it match its sibling files?
  • Does it respect every rule in .ai/PROJECT.md § Global rules?

Correctness

  • Are edge cases handled? (empty, loading, error, long content)
  • Any obvious bugs, race conditions, resource leaks, stale state?

Run the Check command from CLAUDE.md § Commands and include failures.

Output

If changes are needed:

  1. List specific issues with file:line
  2. Provide the fixed code

If the code is good:

  • Say so briefly and move on

Guidelines

  • Be constructive, not nitpicky
  • Focus on what matters: bugs, clarity, maintainability
  • Don't suggest changes just to suggest changes
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 56 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A b41b7f008359

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository ikhanux/ai-coding-blueprint (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 341 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-21.

Code reviewDebugging
Related

review compared with commands from other repositories

review next to 6 commands from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
reviewikhanux/ai-coding-blueprintCommand21mo agoMITA13Claude Code
refactor-cleanwshobson/agentsCommand42kyesterdayMITA26Claude Code
deep-audit.skeletonvarienos/agentic-workflowCommand591mo agoMITA0Claude Code
harness:auditIntense-Visions/harness-engineeringCommand233d agoMITA40Claude Code
modifyMartyBonacci/specswarmCommand673mo agoMITA14Claude Code
prism-graphShailesh200/prismCommand1018d agoMITA11Claude Code
hotfixlugassawan/swe-workbenchCommand32d agoMITA32Claude Code