Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/illodev/workfile/claimgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/illodev/workfileWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00198 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00099 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00040 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
claim scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Claim $1 with pnpm workfile card claim $1 --scope $2.
The scope is the set of paths you intend to modify. It is what stops two agents from editing the same files, so name it honestly — too wide blocks other work, too narrow defeats the point.
If the card is already claimed by someone else, stop and report it rather than forcing: the other claim may be a live session.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 16 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A cda35058d85e
claim is a command published in the GitHub repository illodev/workfile (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 198 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
prime
Load AI-optimized workflow context for beads issue tracking.
workflow
Show the AI-supervised issue workflow guide.
card
Open one self-contained OverClick card.
deep-audit.skeleton
Aciklama: Bu bolum Bootstrap tarafindan manifest verileriyle doldurulur. Gerekli manifest alanlari: project.description, stack.primary, project.structure, project.subprojects, stack.orm, stack.authmethod Ornek cikti.
pre-deploy.skeleton
Aciklama: Bu bolum Bootstrap tarafindan manifest verileriyle doldurulur. Gerekli manifest alanlari: project.description, stack.primary, project.structure, project.subprojects Ornek cikti.
auto-review.skeleton
Aciklama: Bu bolum Bootstrap tarafindan manifest verileriyle doldurulur. Gerekli manifest alanlari: project.description, stack.primary, project.structure Ornek cikti.