Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/illusionaireal/oh-my-patentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/archimedes)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/archimedes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/archimedes/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/archimedes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/illusionaireal/oh-my-patent/archimedes.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00239 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00120 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
archimedes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Command: /archimedes
Description
启动专利交底书主流程编排器（Archimedes），开始或继续一个专利项目。
Usage
/archimedes [topic or intent]
Parameters
topic: 可选的专利选题/意向描述（可选，留空则基于当前项目状态继续）
Behavior
- 检查当前目录是否在专利项目内（.patent/state.json 存在）
- 如果存在现有项目，读取当前状态并继续到下一个工作流步骤
- 如果不存在，提示用户选择已有项目或用
/patent-new创建新项目 - 启动
archimedes编排代理，自动路由到所需的子代理完成任务
Example
/archimedes 基于国密SM2的预计算池缓存优化
Output
- 当前工作流状态（INIT / RESEARCH / BRAINSTORM_R1 / ...）
- 自动启动代理并输出处理结果到
references/目录
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 28 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A bca45976d538
archimedes is a command published in the GitHub repository illusionaireal/oh-my-patent (94 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 239 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
deps-audit
Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
review-policy
Review a policy document for structure, coverage, and language quality.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.