Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/iloveitaly/llm-ide-rulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/iloveitaly/llm-ide-rules/python-command)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/iloveitaly/llm-ide-rules/python-command"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/iloveitaly/llm-ide-rules/python-command/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/iloveitaly/llm-ide-rules/python-command"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/iloveitaly/llm-ide-rules/python-command.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00040 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00016 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00008 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00004 |
Grade A, and why
python-command scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Python Command
- we don't have to put everything in a single perform. You can use helper functions. Can you modularize the code a bit and use helper functions so it's easier to read?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 4 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 9a94aa77c92c
python-command is a command published in the GitHub repository iloveitaly/llm-ide-rules (13 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 40 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
boot
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session (alias for /bootstrap).
cloud-sdk-ai-chat-template
Generate or review a JavaScript or TypeScript chat template for SAP Cloud SDK for AI with safe configuration boundaries.
prompt-eval-debug
Debug any prompt with a tiny eval suite (control, edge, boundary), failure diagnosis, and smallest next change, no blind rewrite.
agent-system-prompt
Write a system prompt for an AI agent that defines its role, tools, boundaries, and output clearly enough to act reliably.
reduce-hallucination
A prompt that makes LLMs hallucinate less when they don't know.
ai-do
You are a routing assistant for DSPy AI skills. Understand the user's problem, pick the best skill, and generate a ready-to-run prompt.