Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/indranilbanerjee/neels-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/indranilbanerjee/neels-plugins/audit-content)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/indranilbanerjee/neels-plugins/audit-content"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/indranilbanerjee/neels-plugins/audit-content/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/indranilbanerjee/neels-plugins/audit-content"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/indranilbanerjee/neels-plugins/audit-content.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00513 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00205 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00103 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
audit-content scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to audit-content — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Audit Content
This command is a thin wrapper. The complete audit procedure — including the canonical
freshness scoring model — lives in skills/cf-audit/SKILL.md.
Read that file and execute it end to end. Do not improvise a different scoring model here.
Trigger
User runs /contentforge:audit-content or asks to audit their content, check for content
decay, find content gaps, or assess content health.
Gather inputs
If not provided in the arguments, ask before proceeding:
- Content source — Google Drive folder URL, WordPress site URL, CSV file
(columns:
title,url,publish_date,content_type,word_count), or a pasted list - Audit scope —
freshness|gaps|both(default) - Optional — aging threshold in months (default 12), brand filter, target keywords CSV, competitor URLs
Canonical scoring (defined in the skill — summarized here for orientation only)
Freshness = 4 factors: Age 35% / Statistics currency 25% / Link health 20% / Citation recency 20%. Bands: Fresh 90-100, Good 70-89, Aging 50-69, Stale 30-49, Expired 0-29. The skill file is authoritative if this summary ever disagrees.
Execute
Follow skills/cf-audit/SKILL.md in full:
load inventory → freshness scoring → coverage gap analysis → performance analysis
(if analytics connected) → prioritized recommendations (refresh / new / retire).
After the audit
Ask: "Would you like me to:
- Create content briefs for the top gap opportunities? (
/contentforge:content-brief) - Start refreshing the highest-priority piece? (
/contentforge:content-refresh) - Build a quarterly content calendar from these recommendations? (
/contentforge:cf-calendar) - Re-research the SERP and competitors for a specific topic in depth? (
/contentforge:cf-brief) - Export this audit to a spreadsheet?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 47 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 8b3a138fffcd
audit-content is a command published in the GitHub repository indranilbanerjee/neels-plugins (6 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 513 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to audit-content, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
create-content
Generate SEO + AEO + GEO-optimized content for a topic or keyword.
diagnose-underperformer
Diagnose why a specific Google Ads or Meta Ads campaign / ad set / ad is underperforming and prescribe the next concrete action. Use when the user says something like "why is X not converting?", "this campaign is wasting money", or "why are impressions so low?". Read-only — no changes are made.
launch-pmax
Launch a Google Ads Performance Max campaign with a complete asset group, audience signals, and (for ecom) listing groups. Built paused for review. Use when the user wants a new PMax campaign.
create-content
Create a full content piece through the 10-phase pipeline. "create content about X".
social-adapt
Repurpose an article into social posts for 8 platforms. "make social posts from this blog".
ma-strategy
Develop M&A strategy including target screening, synergy analysis, or integration planning.