Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/indranilbanerjee/neels-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/indranilbanerjee/neels-plugins/revision)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/indranilbanerjee/neels-plugins/revision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/indranilbanerjee/neels-plugins/revision/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/indranilbanerjee/neels-plugins/revision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/indranilbanerjee/neels-plugins/revision.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00209 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00084 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00042 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
revision scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Revision
Apply specific revision feedback to a post. Regenerates only the affected elements (image, copy, or both).
Process
- Load post and current state from status-tracker.json
- Parse feedback to determine what needs changing (image, copy, or both)
- Incorporate feedback into regeneration prompt
- Re-run the affected steps. A changed image or video goes back through
/socialforge:compose-creative, whose "Quote, then go" section quotes the paid generation and waits for the user'sgo(a revision is a new paid call, even when the first one was approved); changed copy goes through/socialforge:adapt-copy, which is free - Update revision_history in status-tracker.json
- Show revised post for approval
- Max 3 revision cycles per post before escalation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 18 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A f42afc963a7e
revision is a command published in the GitHub repository indranilbanerjee/neels-plugins (6 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 209 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-12.
Other commands, from other repositories
create-content
Generate SEO + AEO + GEO-optimized content for a topic or keyword.
diagnose-underperformer
Diagnose why a specific Google Ads or Meta Ads campaign / ad set / ad is underperforming and prescribe the next concrete action. Use when the user says something like "why is X not converting?", "this campaign is wasting money", or "why are impressions so low?". Read-only — no changes are made.
launch-pmax
Launch a Google Ads Performance Max campaign with a complete asset group, audience signals, and (for ecom) listing groups. Built paused for review. Use when the user wants a new PMax campaign.
create-content
Create a full content piece through the 10-phase pipeline. "create content about X".
social-adapt
Repurpose an article into social posts for 8 platforms. "make social posts from this blog".
market-entry
Develop a market entry strategy for a new market, geography, or segment.