Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Insajin/autopus-adkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/insajin/autopus-adk/auto-canary)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/insajin/autopus-adk/auto-canary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/insajin/autopus-adk/auto-canary/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/insajin/autopus-adk/auto-canary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/insajin/autopus-adk/auto-canary.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00104 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00052 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00021 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00010 |
Grade A, and why
auto-canary scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
$ARGUMENTS
Treat the text above as the full argument payload for /auto-canary.
Load exact detail skill auto-canary; this is the same target selected by /auto canary ....
Preserve --model <provider/model> and --variant <value> when present.
Do not restate or expand the arguments unless needed for execution.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 12 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A f3642fe396ad
auto-canary is a command published in the GitHub repository Insajin/autopus-adk (111 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 104 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
e2e-echo-command
E2E test command — echoes back the user message.
qawolfCliRunResults.template
How to use what qawolf run get --run-id --json returns, and how to read the Playwright trace it links to.
qawolf-cli
Manage QA Wolf through the qawolf CLI. Use when asked to create, update, or list coverage requests, bug reports, or maintenance reports; start a run of flows or tags on the QA Wolf platform or read a run's results; list, set, or delete environment variables; manage environments, flows, or tags; request automation of…
frontend-e2e
Perform a thorough live E2E test of a frontend web application using browser-bridge MCP tools. Tests every page, interactive element, form, navigation flow, responsive breakpoint, and accessibility rule through real browser interaction.
health-check
Perform a comprehensive, read-only end-to-end review of any portfolio app across three layers — Frontend (E2E), Database integrity, and Audit Log & User Activity — and produce a structured, observations-only report. Optionally, on explicit opt-in, generate (never apply) the infrastructure provisions needed so future…
gba-test
$ARGUMENTS: test mode — game profile defines available modes (e.g., smoke, gameplay, save, stress, full, ai, battle, nav, custom ).