Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Insight-Services-APAC/ingenious. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Insight-Services-APAC/ingenious/main/.claude/commands/analysis/iteratively-verify.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Insight-Services-APAC/ingeniousWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/insight-services-apac/ingenious/iteratively-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/insight-services-apac/ingenious/iteratively-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/insight-services-apac/ingenious/iteratively-verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/insight-services-apac/ingenious/iteratively-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/insight-services-apac/ingenious/iteratively-verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00548 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00219 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
iteratively-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Autonomous Web App Development and Validation
Work autonomously to validate the application end-to-end per all User Stories in spec.md. Resolve all remaining issues until fully functional.
You cannot stop until everything in spec.md is implemented and validated.
Autonomous Work Expectations
- Do not stop early - work until everything is complete
- Do not stop tasks due to token budget concerns
- Complete tasks fully, even if end of budget is approaching
- Never artificially stop any task early regardless of context remaining
Required Work Cycle
For each and every feature in spec.md:
- Validate - Test the feature thoroughly
- Debug - Identify any issues found
- Implement - Code fixes and features as needed
- Unblock - Resolve all problems
- Re-validate - Confirm feature is fully functional
- Repeat - Move to next feature until all complete
Development Workflow
After any code change:
- Deploy changes immediately
- Confirm deployment successful
- Re-test functionality
- Proceed only after verifying stability
Debug cycle: Debug -> Fix -> Deploy -> Confirm resolution
Validation Requirements
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Source | All User Stories in spec.md |
| Coverage | Functional correctness, data consistency, state transitions, error handling |
Validation workflow:
- Test feature end-to-end
- If issues found: debug, implement fixes, deploy
- Re-validate
- Repeat until feature is fully functional
- Move to next feature
Page requirements:
- All functions fully implemented and data-driven (no hardcoded placeholders)
- All routes accessible via UI
- Document new components with behavior and state details
- Map UI elements to corresponding User Stories
Specifications Compliance
spec.md is the authoritative source - all items must be completed.
If specifications are unclear, refine them to be explicit, structured, consistent, and agent-friendly while preserving original intent.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 24fb86c7b054
iteratively-verify is a command published in the GitHub repository Insight-Services-APAC/ingenious (25 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 548 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other commands, from other repositories
playwright-test-heal
Run all my tests and fix the failing ones.
ui-aqa-flow-test-report-analysis
Phase 7 Test Report Analysis of ui-aqa-flow.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
run-workflow
Validate and establish the proven rn-dev-agent operating sequence before a real React Native journey — declared package manager and dependencies, read-only inventory, typed session recovery, one exclusive device, managed integration and Metro, only the requested proof, reverse-order cleanup.
ralph-loop
/ralph-loop - Verify work was done correctly before marking complete.
verify
You are invoking the verify skill - comprehensive verification following Boris Cherny's pattern.