Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/intellegix/intellegix-code-agent-toolkit/fix-issuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/intellegix/intellegix-code-agent-toolkitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00711 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00356 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
fix-issue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 135 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fix GitHub Issue
Analyze and fix the GitHub issue: $ARGUMENTS
Process
Phase 1: Understand the Issue
-
Fetch Issue Details
gh issue view $ARGUMENTS --json title,body,labels,assignees,comments -
Analyze the Problem
- Read the issue description carefully
- Check comments for additional context
- Identify reproduction steps if provided
- Note any related issues or PRs mentioned
-
Search the Codebase
- Find affected files by searching for relevant terms
- Identify the root cause location
- Check git blame for recent changes to the area
Phase 2: Reproduce & Verify
-
Create Reproduction
- Write a failing test that demonstrates the bug
- Or create a minimal reproduction scenario
- Document how to trigger the issue
# Run existing tests to establish baseline npm test -- --testPathPattern="[affected-area]" # or pytest tests/[affected_area] -v
Phase 3: Implement the Fix
-
Make Minimum Necessary Changes
- Fix the root cause, not just the symptom
- Avoid scope creep - don't refactor unrelated code
- Follow existing code patterns
-
Update/Add Tests
- Ensure the failing test now passes
- Add edge case tests if needed
- Verify no regressions
Phase 4: Verify the Fix
-
Run Verification
# Type checking npm run type-check || mypy src/ # Full test suite npm test || pytest # Linting npm run lint || ruff check . -
Manual Verification
- Test the fix manually if applicable
- Verify in relevant environments
Phase 5: Create Commit
- Stage and Commit
git add -A git commit -m "fix([scope]): [brief description] [Longer explanation if needed] - [Bullet point of what changed] - [Another bullet point] Fixes #$ARGUMENTS"
Output Format
## Issue Analysis: #[NUMBER]
### Problem Summary
[1-2 sentence description of the bug]
### Root Cause
[Technical explanation of why this was happening]
### Solution
[What was done to fix it]
### Files Modified
| File | Change |
|------|--------|
| `path/to/file` | [Description of change] |
### Testing
- [x] Added failing test
- [x] Test now passes
- [x] No regressions
### Verification Commands Run
```bash
npm test -- --testPathPattern="affected"
npm run type-check
Commit
fix(scope): description
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 135 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e2243b0d13be
fix-issue is a command published in the GitHub repository intellegix/intellegix-code-agent-toolkit (57 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 711 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
README
Git workflow and quality assurance commands for the claude-skills repository.
agentlas-cloud
Staff a task only from the signed-in owner's Agent Cloud agents.
dispatcher
Pick the next-best repo to work on across the portfolio — rank free repos, recommend one, claim its lease atomically, and route to the entry command.
tldr
Re-apply TLDR rules for this turn (verdict first, no filler).
execute
Interactive workflow for workspace isolation, pane-delegated implementation, testing, review, and cleanup.
me-figure-discussion
Write or review thermal-fluid figure discussion with observation, physical mechanism, comparison, uncertainty, and claim limits.