Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/intellegix/intellegix-code-agent-toolkit/smart-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/intellegix/intellegix-code-agent-toolkitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00838 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00419 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00168 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
smart-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Smart Plan - Multi-Phase Project Planning
Create a comprehensive implementation plan for: $ARGUMENTS
Planning Process
Phase 0: Portfolio Context
- Check portfolio constraints
- Read
~/.claude/portfolio/PORTFOLIO.md - What tier and phase is this project?
- Does this plan respect the phase restrictions and anti-patterns?
- Is the complexity appropriate for the user count?
- If adding enterprise patterns to a <10 user app, STOP and simplify.
- Read
Phase 1: Requirements Analysis
-
Clarify scope
- What is the expected outcome?
- What are the acceptance criteria?
- Are there constraints (time, technology, budget)?
-
Identify stakeholders
- Who will use this feature?
- Who needs to approve/review?
- Are there external dependencies?
Phase 2: Research & Context
-
Explore the codebase
- Find related existing implementations
- Identify patterns to follow
- Note any technical debt or constraints
-
Research best practices (if needed)
- Industry standards for this type of feature
- Security considerations
- Performance implications
Phase 3: Architecture Design
-
Design the solution
- High-level architecture
- Data flow diagrams
- API contracts (if applicable)
- Database schema changes (if applicable)
-
Create ADR (Architecture Decision Record)
# ADR-[NUMBER]: [Title] ## Status Proposed ## Context [Why is this decision needed?] ## Decision [What is the decision?] ## Consequences [What are the positive and negative impacts?] ## Alternatives Considered [What other options were evaluated?]
Phase 4: Task Breakdown
- Create implementation tasks
- Order by dependency (what must come first)
- Estimate complexity (S/M/L)
- Identify parallelizable work
Output Format
# Implementation Plan: [Feature Name]
## Overview
[1-2 paragraph summary of what will be built]
## Requirements
### Functional Requirements
- [ ] FR-1: [Requirement]
- [ ] FR-2: [Requirement]
### Non-Functional Requirements
- [ ] NFR-1: [Performance/Security/Accessibility requirement]
## Architecture
### High-Level Design
[Describe the architecture]
### Data Model Changes
```sql
-- Schema changes if applicable
API Changes
POST /api/v1/resource
Request: { ... }
Response: { ... }
Implementation Tasks
Phase 1: Foundation (Prerequisites)
| Task | Complexity | Dependencies | Files |
|---|---|---|---|
| Task 1 | S | None | path/to/file.ts |
Phase 2: Core Implementation
| Task | Complexity | Dependencies | Files |
|---|---|---|---|
| Task 2 | M | Task 1 | path/to/file.ts |
Phase 3: Testing & Polish
| Task | Complexity | Dependencies | Files |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add tests | M | Phase 2 | tests/ |
Risk Assessment
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk 1 | Medium | High | How to mitigate |
Testing Strategy
- Unit tests: [What to test]
- Integration tests: [What to test]
- Manual testing: [Scenarios to verify]
Rollout Plan
- [Step 1]
- [Step 2]
Success Metrics
- [How will we know this is successful?]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 143 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 45b2f89972a1
smart-plan is a command published in the GitHub repository intellegix/intellegix-code-agent-toolkit (57 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 838 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
README
Git workflow and quality assurance commands for the claude-skills repository.
agentlas-cloud
Staff a task only from the signed-in owner's Agent Cloud agents.
dispatcher
Pick the next-best repo to work on across the portfolio — rank free repos, recommend one, claim its lease atomically, and route to the entry command.
tldr
Re-apply TLDR rules for this turn (verdict first, no filler).
execute
Interactive workflow for workspace isolation, pane-delegated implementation, testing, review, and cleanup.
me-figure-discussion
Write or review thermal-fluid figure discussion with observation, physical mechanism, comparison, uncertainty, and claim limits.