agentmods.dev

borderlint: Command for Claude Code

.claude/commands/review-task.md

review-task is a command for Claude Code from iolairus/borderlint. It costs 8 tokens per session (85 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only reviewer for individual software tasks. It checks whether a task is appropriately sized, clearly stated, testable, consistent, and linked to its source requirements.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit a task in backlog/tasks/ and receive an APPROVE or REVISE verdict.
Why use it?
It exposes vague goals, missing acceptance checks, oversized work, and broken links to the broader plan before implementation begins.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution. Also seen: mentions subagents.

This is iolairus/borderlint's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on borderlint itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything borderlint configures →

not rated 10repo 7d ago A scan 8 tokens original MIT
View source ↗ iolairus/borderlint
Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to iolairus/borderlint. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iolairus/borderlint/main/.claude/commands/review-task.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/iolairus/borderlint

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-task

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/iolairus/borderlint/review-task/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/iolairus/borderlint/review-task)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/iolairus/borderlint/review-task"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/iolairus/borderlint/review-task/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-task

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/iolairus/borderlint/review-task"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/iolairus/borderlint/review-task.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 8 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 85 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00008 $0.00085
Opus 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00034
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00002 $0.00017
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00009

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 82be83c629ee, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-task scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/review-task.md · 9 lines

What it actually says

Delegate this work to the task-reviewer subagent (read-only reviewer) and relay its full report to the user.

Review the task $ARGUMENTS under backlog/tasks/. Apply the full checklist (sizing, goal quality, acceptance criteria, consistency, traceability). Give a verdict: APPROVE or REVISE.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 9 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 82be83c629ee

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-task is a command published in the GitHub repository iolairus/borderlint (10 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 85 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Code reviewTesting
Related

review-task compared with commands from other repositories

review-task next to 6 commands from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
review-taskiolairus/borderlintCommand107d agoMITA8Claude Code
diff-reviewcoco-research/cocoCommand785yesterdayApache-2.0A11Claude Code
review-branchdamusix/atomic-claudeCommand1154d agoMITA35Claude Code
refactorRchGrav/claudeboxCommand1.2k1mo agoMITA9Claude Code
spec-trace-requirementsrjmurillo/ai-agentsCommand49yesterdayMITA0GitHub Copilot
merge-conflict-analysisrjmurillo/ai-agentsCommand49yesterdayMITA0GitHub Copilot
initazrtydxb/procoderCommand21111d agoApache-2.0A16Claude Code