Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to IsJunNa/OpenClawForJun. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IsJunNa/OpenClawForJun/main/.codex/prompts/speckit.plan.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/IsJunNa/OpenClawForJunWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/isjunna/openclawforjun/speckit.plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/isjunna/openclawforjun/speckit.plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/isjunna/openclawforjun/speckit.plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/isjunna/openclawforjun/speckit.plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/isjunna/openclawforjun/speckit.plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00925 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00370 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00185 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
speckit.plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- speckit.plan — 97% identical, 2 lines differ
What it actually says
用户输入
$ARGUMENTS
在继续之前, 你必须考虑用户输入(如果不为空).
大纲
-
设置: 从仓库根目录运行
.specify/scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh --json并解析 JSON 获取 FEATURE_SPEC, IMPL_PLAN, SPECS_DIR, BRANCH. 对于参数中的单引号如 "I'm Groot", 使用转义语法: 例如 'I'''m Groot'(或尽可能使用双引号: "I'm Groot"). -
加载上下文: 读取 FEATURE_SPEC 和
.specify/memory/constitution.md. 加载 IMPL_PLAN 模板(已复制). -
执行计划工作流: 按照 IMPL_PLAN 模板中的结构:
- 填充技术上下文(将未知项标记为 NEEDS CLARIFICATION)
- 从章程文档填充章程检查部分
- 评估关卡(如果违规无正当理由则报错)
- 阶段 0: 生成 research.md(解决所有 NEEDS CLARIFICATION)
- 阶段 1: 生成 data-model.md, contracts/, quickstart.md
- 阶段 1: 通过运行代理脚本更新代理上下文
- 设计后重新评估章程检查
-
停止并报告: 命令在阶段 2 规划后结束. 报告分支, IMPL_PLAN 路径和生成的制品.
阶段
阶段 0: 大纲与研究
-
从上述技术上下文中提取未知项:
- 每个 NEEDS CLARIFICATION → 研究任务
- 每个依赖项 → 最佳实践任务
- 每个集成 → 模式任务
-
生成和分发研究代理:
For each unknown in Technical Context: Task: "Research {unknown} for {feature context}" For each technology choice: Task: "Find best practices for {tech} in {domain}" -
在
research.md中整合发现, 使用格式:- Decision: [选择了什么]
- Rationale: [为什么选择]
- Alternatives considered: [还评估了什么]
输出: research.md, 所有 NEEDS CLARIFICATION 已解决
阶段 1: 设计与合同
前提条件: research.md 完成
-
从功能规范中提取实体 →
data-model.md:- 实体名称, 字段, 关系
- 来自需求的验证规则
- 状态转换(如适用)
-
定义接口合同(如果项目有外部接口) →
/contracts/:- 识别项目向用户或其他系统暴露的接口
- 为项目类型选择合适的合同格式
- 示例: 库的公共 API、CLI 工具的命令模式、Web 服务的端点、解析器的语法、应用程序的 UI 合同
- 如果项目是纯内部项目(构建脚本、一次性工具等), 跳过此步骤
-
代理上下文更新:
- 运行
.specify/scripts/bash/update-agent-context.sh codex - 这些脚本检测正在使用哪个 AI 代理
- 更新相应的代理特定上下文文件
- 仅添加当前计划中的新技术
- 保留标记之间的手动添加内容
- 运行
输出: data-model.md, /contracts/*, quickstart.md, 代理特定文件
关键规则
- 使用绝对路径
- 关卡失败或未解决的澄清事项时报错
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 91 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 7451f0c5176d
speckit.plan is a command published in the GitHub repository IsJunNa/OpenClawForJun (77 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 925 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
speckit.plan compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| speckit.planIsJunNa/OpenClawForJun | Command | 77 | 8mo ago | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code, Codex |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |