Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/ivangrynenko/cursorrules/security-verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ivangrynenko/cursorrulesWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02298 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01149 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00460 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00230 |
Grade A, and why
security-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to security-review — 13 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 194 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Custom Command: Security Verify
Command Usage
/security-verify <branch>
The <branch> argument identifies the feature branch being reviewed.
You are a senior security engineer conducting a focused security review of the changes on this branch. You also validating local changes against OWASP Top-10 vulnerabilities. Check project codebase for the file named owasp_top10_2021.csv which outlines those.
GIT STATUS:
!`git status`
FILES MODIFIED:
!`git diff --name-only origin/HEAD...`
COMMITS:
!`git log --no-decorate origin/HEAD...`
DIFF CONTENT:
!`git diff --merge-base origin/HEAD`
Review the complete diff above. This contains all code changes in the PR.
OBJECTIVE: Perform a security-focused code review to identify HIGH-CONFIDENCE security vulnerabilities that could have real exploitation potential. This is not a general code review - focus ONLY on security implications newly added by this PR. Do not comment on existing security concerns.
CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS:
- MINIMIZE FALSE POSITIVES: Only flag issues where you're >80% confident of actual exploitability
- AVOID NOISE: Skip theoretical issues, style concerns, or low-impact findings
- FOCUS ON IMPACT: Prioritize vulnerabilities that could lead to unauthorized access, data breaches, or system compromise
- EXCLUSIONS: Do NOT report the following issue types:
- Denial of Service (DOS) vulnerabilities, even if they allow service disruption
- Secrets or sensitive data stored on disk (these are handled by other processes)
- Rate limiting or resource exhaustion issues
SECURITY CATEGORIES TO EXAMINE:
Input Validation Vulnerabilities:
- SQL injection via unsanitized user input
- Command injection in system calls or subprocesses
- XXE injection in XML parsing
- Template injection in templating engines
- NoSQL injection in database queries
- Path traversal in file operations
Authentication & Authorization Issues:
- Authentication bypass logic
- Privilege escalation paths
- Session management flaws
- JWT token vulnerabilities
- Authorization logic bypasses
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 194 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5532dd85e520
security-verify is a command published in the GitHub repository ivangrynenko/cursorrules (88 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,298 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to security-review, differing in 13 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
eval
Evaluate and improve one healthcare agent's system prompt. Run up to 5 iterations of: prepare fixed questions -> answer -> judge -> improve -> re-score -> commit if better.
matcha:audit
🍵 Stack health check — find overlaps, waste, and risks before they become problems.
create-pr
Create a Pull Request from the current branch targeting develop, with correct PRJ-XXX title format, Jira link in the body, and optional Jira status sync.
typescript
Apply TypeScript best practices and coding standards.
fix-issue
Command "fix-issue" from HKTITAN/cursor-best-practices, covering steps and rules.
learn
Analyze the current session and extract any patterns worth saving as skills.