Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/ivangrynenko/cursorrules/speckit.analyzegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ivangrynenko/cursorrulesWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01489 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00745 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00298 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00149 |
Grade A, and why
speckit.analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to speckit.analyze — 16 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 181 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
User Input
Use the user-provided arguments (if any) as contextual input
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Goal
Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items across the three core artifacts (spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md) before implementation. This command MUST run only after /tasks has successfully produced a complete tasks.md.
Operating Constraints
STRICTLY READ-ONLY: Do not modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer an optional remediation plan (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands would be invoked manually).
Constitution Authority: The project constitution (.specify/memory/constitution.md) is non-negotiable within this analysis scope. Constitution conflicts are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the spec, plan, or tasks—not dilution, reinterpretation, or silent ignoring of the principle. If a principle itself needs to change, that must occur in a separate, explicit constitution update outside /analyze.
Execution Steps
1. Initialize Analysis Context
Run .specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks once from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS. Derive absolute paths:
- SPEC = FEATURE_DIR/spec.md
- PLAN = FEATURE_DIR/plan.md
- TASKS = FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md
Abort with an error message if any required file is missing (instruct the user to run missing prerequisite command). For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
Load only the minimal necessary context from each artifact:
From spec.md:
- Overview/Context
- Functional Requirements
- Non-Functional Requirements
- User Stories
- Edge Cases (if present)
From plan.md:
- Architecture/stack choices
- Data Model references
- Phases
- Technical constraints
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 181 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f8a48f94ecb0
speckit.analyze is a command published in the GitHub repository ivangrynenko/cursorrules (88 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,489 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to speckit.analyze, differing in 16 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
eval
Evaluate and improve one healthcare agent's system prompt. Run up to 5 iterations of: prepare fixed questions -> answer -> judge -> improve -> re-score -> commit if better.
review
Karen repository review with market-aware scoring.
matcha:audit
🍵 Stack health check — find overlaps, waste, and risks before they become problems.
matcha:markers
🍵 Scan for // matcha: markers in the codebase and group by severity.
refactor
Code refactoring slash command.
boost-migration
Guided migration builder with source data analysis and Drupal Migrate API YAML generation.