Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ivklgn/ai-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ivklgn/ai-kit/test-health-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ivklgn/ai-kit/test-health-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ivklgn/ai-kit/test-health-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ivklgn/ai-kit/test-health-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ivklgn/ai-kit/test-health-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00057 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00028 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00011 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00006 |
Grade A, and why
test-health-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/ai-kit:test-health-check
Arguments
The user invoked this command with: $ARGUMENTS
Instructions
Use the skill at skills/test-health-check/SKILL.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 14 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A eac7107c6898
test-health-check is a command published in the GitHub repository ivklgn/ai-kit (12 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 57 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
test-plan
Generate a test strategy document — test matrix, coverage goals, and test pyramid allocation for the current project.
test-suite
Run comprehensive test suite with coverage analysis.
deps-update
Audit and update dependencies safely.
ijfw-audit
Run the IJFW audit gate for the current workflow phase. Usage: /ijfw-audit [phase name].
pull-repos
Pull all repos (parent + marketplace clones + configured project repos).
update-counts
Update all hardcoded counts (skills, agents, marketplace repos/skills) across documentation from filesystem.