Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/iwritec0de/app-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/iwritec0de/app-dev/quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/iwritec0de/app-dev/quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/iwritec0de/app-dev/quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/iwritec0de/app-dev/quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/iwritec0de/app-dev/quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00438 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00175 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Quality Gate
Manual quality gate control and status.
Load the quality-gate skill for check configuration and enforcement rules.
Usage
/quality [run|status|config]
Arguments
Parse $ARGUMENTS to extract the subcommand:
- run (default) — Run quality checks immediately without waiting for session end
- status — Show quality gate configuration and recent results
- config — Show which checks are active for this project
Instructions
/quality run
Run the quality gate checks immediately:
-
Confirm this is a JavaScript/TypeScript project (
package.jsonortsconfig.jsonpresent). -
Run the JavaScript/TypeScript checks:
npx tsc --noEmit(if TypeScript)npx eslint .npx prettier --check .npx jest --passWithNoTestsnpx knip(dead code detection, if installed)npx type-coverage --at-least 80(if TypeScript, if installed)npx madge --circular src(circular dependencies, if installed)
-
Report results in table format:
## Quality Gate Results | Check | Status | Details | |-------|--------|---------| | TypeScript | PASS | No type errors | | eslint | FAIL | 3 errors, 2 warnings | | prettier | WARN | 5 files need formatting | | jest | PASS | 42 tests passed | -
If any check fails, list the specific fix commands.
/quality status
Show:
- Whether quality gate is enabled (
CLAUDE_QUALITY_GATEenv) - Current retry count
- Last 5 entries from
.claude/quality-gate.log - Active blocker status
/quality config
Show which checks would run for this project:
- Detected language(s)
- Available tools (installed vs missing)
- Check configuration (standards, levels, etc.)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 64 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 8c046c8ac9ca
quality is a command published in the GitHub repository iwritec0de/app-dev (3 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 438 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
cloudflare-durable-objects:setup
Interactive Durable Objects project initialization. Scaffolds new DO project with proper bindings, migrations, and boilerplate code.
cloudflare-workers:test-setup
Interactive Vitest setup wizard for Cloudflare Workers testing. Configures @cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers, mocks bindings, and creates example tests.
test-accounts
Show PayPal sandbox test accounts and scenario-specific testing tips.
apex
APEX Methodology - The systematic Analyze-Plan-Execute-eLicit-eXamine approach for intelligent development. Reduces hallucination and defect risk through mandatory parallel research, self-review, and validation gates.
test
Test commit. Use for add tests, update tests, test coverage, unit test, spec.
sm-swab
Run slop-mop's iterative development loop for this repository.