Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/J-Pster/Psters_AI_WorkflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/j-pster/psters_ai_workflow/pwf-work-tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/j-pster/psters_ai_workflow/pwf-work-tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/j-pster/psters_ai_workflow/pwf-work-tdd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/j-pster/psters_ai_workflow/pwf-work-tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/j-pster/psters_ai_workflow/pwf-work-tdd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00400 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00200 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00080 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
pwf-work-tdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Execute Work with TDD (Opt-In)
Use this command only when tests-first delivery is explicitly requested.
Apply skills/using-psters-workflow/SKILL.md at start.
Input
<work_tdd_description> #$ARGUMENTS </pwf-work_tdd_description>
If empty, ask: "What should I implement with TDD?"
Workflow
- Apply
skills/docs-baseline-loading/SKILL.mdand execute baseline loading before coding. - Run
/pwf-workStep 1 research discipline (docs first, context first). - Apply
skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md. - For each small behavior slice:
- write failing test (Red),
- implement minimal fix (Green),
- refactor safely (Refactor).
- Keep verification evidence in each cycle.
- Apply
skills/docs-maintenance-after-work/SKILL.mdbefore finishing. - Finish with
/pwf-reviewand/pwf-commit-changesrecommendations. Work commands update docs as part of the workflow; use/pwf-docor/pwf-doc-capturefor explicit scope-targeted documentation.
Boundaries
- Do not force TDD on unrelated tasks.
- Keep test scope focused on requested behavior only.
Verification Evidence Format
Use the shared evidence format from rules/operational-guardrails.mdc.
Project-specific override is allowed via docs/workflow/operational-overrides.md (if present).
Next Recommended Commands
/pwf-reviewafter TDD cycles are complete/pwf-commit-changeswhen review passes
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 48 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A e284060791e1
pwf-work-tdd is a command published in the GitHub repository J-Pster/Psters_AI_Workflow (289 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 400 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
api-aqa-flow
Workflow for backend API test automation: TMS / Issue Tracker test cases → automated API tests, HITL-gated.
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code - write the test first, watch it fail, write minimal code to pass; ensures tests actually verify behavior by requiring failure first.
bugfix
Bug fix workflow: root cause analysis → user review → regression test + fix via TDD.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
usage-add
PitWay: Accumulate measured planning or qa token usage onto a milestone.
dashboard
Generar dashboard HTML local con métricas de eficiencia del proyecto SDD.