Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JackScammell/Parliament-Of-ChaosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jackscammell/parliament-of-chaos/infra-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jackscammell/parliament-of-chaos/infra-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jackscammell/parliament-of-chaos/infra-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jackscammell/parliament-of-chaos/infra-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jackscammell/parliament-of-chaos/infra-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00659 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00264 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00132 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
infra-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Infra Review
Analyse infrastructure configuration files for security, performance, and operational best practices. Covers Dockerfiles, Kubernetes manifests, docker-compose files, and CI/CD configs.
Usage
/infra-review [<path>] [--type <docker|k8s|compose|ci>]
Examples:
/infra-review # Auto-detect and review all infra files
/infra-review Dockerfile # Review a specific Dockerfile
/infra-review --type k8s # Review all Kubernetes manifests
/infra-review .github/workflows/ # Review CI/CD pipelines
Options
<path>(optional): Specific file or directory to review--type(optional): Filter to a specific type —docker,k8s,compose,ci
Process
-
Detect Infrastructure Files
- Dockerfiles, .dockerignore
- docker-compose.yml / compose.yaml
- Kubernetes manifests (Deployment, Service, Ingress, ConfigMap, etc.)
- CI configs (.github/workflows/, .gitlab-ci.yml, Jenkinsfile)
- Terraform / CloudFormation (if present)
-
Dockerfile Analysis
- Layer caching efficiency (order of COPY/RUN)
- Image size (multi-stage builds, minimal base images)
- Running as root (security risk)
- Unpinned base image tags (reproducibility)
- Missing .dockerignore entries
- Hardcoded secrets or credentials
-
Kubernetes Analysis
- Missing resource limits and requests
- No liveness/readiness probes
- Privilege escalation (runAsRoot, privileged containers)
- Missing network policies
- Hardcoded ConfigMap values that should be secrets
- Missing pod disruption budgets
-
Docker Compose Analysis
- Network isolation between services
- Volume mount security (host paths)
- Missing restart policies
- Exposed ports that should be internal
-
CI/CD Analysis
- Caching configuration for faster builds
- Unnecessary serial steps that could run in parallel
- Missing matrix strategies for cross-version testing
- Security: pull_request_target misuse, secret exposure
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 85 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A d51e9edb5c3e
infra-review is a command published in the GitHub repository JackScammell/Parliament-Of-Chaos (4 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 659 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
infra-review compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| infra-reviewJackScammell/Parliament-Of-Chaos | Command | 4 | 9d ago | MIT | A | 15 | Claude Code |
| create-docker-mcp-tunnelanthropics/claude-plugins-official | Command | 46k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | B | 26 | Claude Code |
| cisco-isovalent-platform-setupchambear2809/splunk-cisco-skills | Command | 40 | 6d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| k8s-manifestrohitg00/awesome-claude-code-toolkit | Command | 2.8k | 5mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| dns-auditfatihkan/badi | Command | 7 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| estimate-gcp-costarmanzeroeight/fastagent-plugins | Command | 29 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| environment-switching-local-cloud-sshrunnithan/claudex-setup | Command | 1 | 11d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |