Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add jamditis/claude-skills-journalism/plugin install pdf-playgroundWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism/report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism/report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism/report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism/report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism/report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00555 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00278 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create a print-ready HTML program report document.
Version check
Read the plugin version from ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/.claude-plugin/plugin.json and note it. If the file doesn't exist or the read fails, warn the user that the plugin may not be properly installed.
Setup
- Check for brand configuration at
.claude/pdf-playground.local.md - If found, parse the YAML frontmatter for brand settings
- If not found, ask the user for their organization name and primary brand color
- Load the report template from
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/report-template.html - Read the document-design skill for CSS patterns
Brand application
Apply brand settings to the template:
- Replace organization name throughout
- Update CSS variables with brand colors
- Set font families from brand config
- Apply heading case style
Document structure
Page 1 - Cover page:
- Organization branding
- Report title in configured case
- Subtitle (e.g., "Annual report 2025")
- Date range or publication date
Page 2+ - Content sections:
- Executive summary
- Key metrics or highlights (use callout boxes)
- Detailed sections with headings
- Data visualizations or tables
- Quotes and testimonials
Final page:
- Contact information
- Acknowledgments
- Organization info
Report name
The report name is: $ARGUMENTS
If no report name provided, ask the user for:
- Report title
- Time period covered
- Key sections to include
- Any metrics or data to highlight
Footer clearance (critical)
Content MUST NOT touch or overlap the page footer.
- The
.pageelement MUST usedisplay: grid; grid-template-rows: auto 1fr auto - It MUST have exactly 3 direct children:
<header class="page-header">,<div class="page-body">,<footer class="page-footer"> - The content wrapper (
.page-body) MUST haveoverflow: hiddento prevent text bleeding - Never use
position: absolutefor footers, keep them in normal document flow as the third grid row - After generating, always take a screenshot and visually verify the bottom of each page
- If content is too long, reduce content rather than shrinking the footer gap
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 74 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A efbe61906283
report is a command published in the GitHub repository jamditis/claude-skills-journalism (389 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 555 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
export-latex
Export the current paper draft to production-ready LaTeX (.tex) and PDF using the arxiv-style template. Converts draft.md + references.bib + figures/ into a complete LaTeX project with resolved citations, tables, and figures. Compiles to PDF automatically.
ars-mark-read
ARS /ars-mark-read — record human-read signal for one or more citation keys.
ars-format-convert
ARS academic-paper format-convert mode — convert to LaTeX / DOCX / PDF / Markdown.
audit-xls
Audit an Excel workbook — formula errors, hardcoded cells, calculation arc cross-validation.
generate-pdf-document
Specify a generated PDF that survives variable content, with fonts, page breaks, and accessibility handled.
analyze-writing
Analyze academic writing quality of the current draft. Checks for passive voice overuse, weak openings, hedging balance, readability, sentence length variation, and word repetitions. Produces a writing quality report with specific improvement suggestions per section.