Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jamditis/claude-skills-journalismWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism/share-page)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism/share-page"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism/share-page/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism/share-page"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism/share-page.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00552 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00276 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
share-page scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Share Visual Explainer Page
Share a visual explainer HTML file instantly via Vercel. Returns a live URL with no authentication required when a Pi-compatible vercel-deploy skill is installed.
Usage
/share-page <file-path>
Arguments:
file-path- Path to the HTML file to share (required)
Examples:
/share-page ~/.agent/diagrams/my-diagram.html
/share-page /tmp/visual-explainer-output.html
How It Works
- Finds the
visual-explainerskill directory for the current harness - Copies your HTML file to a temp directory as
index.html - Deploys via the Pi-compatible
vercel-deployskill - Returns a live URL immediately
Requirements
- vercel-deploy skill - Required for deployment. In Pi, install with:
pi install npm:vercel-deploy
No Vercel account, Cloudflare account, or API keys needed. The deployment is "claimable", you can transfer it to your Vercel account later if you want.
Script Location
Resolve the script from the installed skill directory, then run it with the HTML file path:
bash ~/.pi/agent/skills/visual-explainer/scripts/share.sh <file>
If the skill is installed somewhere else, use that install path instead. Common locations include ~/.codex/skills/visual-explainer/scripts/share.sh, ~/.config/opencode/skill/visual-explainer/scripts/share.sh, or ./plugins/visual-explainer/scripts/share.sh from a repository checkout.
The script currently looks for the Pi-compatible vercel-deploy script in the standard Pi skill locations. Other harnesses can generate and open HTML normally, but sharing requires that dependency to be available in a compatible location.
Output
Sharing my-diagram.html...
✓ Shared successfully!
Live URL: https://skill-deploy-abc123.vercel.app
Claim URL: https://vercel.com/claim-deployment?code=...
The script also outputs JSON for programmatic use:
{"previewUrl":"https://...","claimUrl":"https://...","deploymentId":"...","projectId":"..."}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 69 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A c4df34927f29
share-page is a command published in the GitHub repository jamditis/claude-skills-journalism (391 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 552 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other commands, from other repositories
cloudflare-api
Hit the Cloudflare REST API for bulk, fleet, and operations wrangler can't do.
plan-platform-migration
Plan a move to a new platform or provider, with parallel running and a reversible cutover.
nyann:apply
Apply an Infrastructure-as-Code change — the highest-stakes mutator in nyann; it can change real cloud infrastructure. Re-runs the plan, shows it, confirms, then applies. Unmistakably opt-in: apply is never the default and destructive applies require a second explicit confirm. For IaC apply intent only (not "apply a…
review-paper
Simulate a double-blind peer review of the current paper. Generates 2 independent reviewer reports in the style of top IS/CS conferences (ICIS, ECIS, MISQ level). Each report includes Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Minor Comments, and Overall Recommendation. Output is saved as simulatedreviews.md and can be fed…
triage-project
Strategic project triage — should you continue, pivot, or kill your current research project? Evaluates 5 signals (results, competition, impact, effort, motivation) and delivers a clear Continue/Pivot/Kill recommendation. For Pivot: suggests concrete new framing. For Kill: suggests what to salvage.
analyze-writing
Analyze academic writing quality of the current draft. Checks for passive voice overuse, weak openings, hedging balance, readability, sentence length variation, and word repetitions. Produces a writing quality report with specific improvement suggestions per section.