openusage: Command for Claude Code

.claude/commands/develop-feature.md

develop-feature is a command for Claude Code from janekbaraniewski/openusage. It costs 0 tokens per session (248 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command for taking a software feature from design through implementation, testing, validation, and a pull request. A pull request is a proposed code change submitted for review.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when you want an end-to-end process for developing a feature: create and review a design, implement it with tests, validate it, fix problems, and prepare the final pull request.
Why use it?
It organizes the work into named stages, so design decisions and validation are not skipped. Each stage waits for your confirmation before continuing.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution.

This is janekbaraniewski/openusage's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on openusage itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything openusage configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to janekbaraniewski/openusage. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/janekbaraniewski/openusage/main/.claude/commands/develop-feature.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/janekbaraniewski/openusage

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for develop-feature

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/janekbaraniewski/openusage/develop-feature/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/janekbaraniewski/openusage/develop-feature)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/janekbaraniewski/openusage/develop-feature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/janekbaraniewski/openusage/develop-feature/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for develop-feature

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/janekbaraniewski/openusage/develop-feature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/janekbaraniewski/openusage/develop-feature.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 248 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00248
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00099
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00050
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00025

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 6ba23d1f85f6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

develop-feature scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/develop-feature.md · 24 lines

What it actually says

Develop the feature "$ARGUMENTS" end-to-end — from design to pull request.

Read and follow the full skill specification in docs/skills/develop-feature/SKILL.md.

This skill orchestrates the full development lifecycle:

  1. Phase 0 — Intake: Check for existing design doc. Ask: full lifecycle or specific phase?

  2. Phase 1 — Design (/design-feature): Design the feature, produce design doc with tasks.

  3. Phase 2 — Review (/review-design): Validate design against codebase, fix discrepancies.

  4. Phase 3 — Implement (/implement-feature): Execute tasks with tests, parallel where possible.

  5. Phase 4 — Validate (/validate-feature): Build, test, design compliance, code quality checks.

  6. Phase 5 — Iterate (/iterate-feature): Fix issues from validation (loops until clean or user decides).

  7. Phase 6 — Finalize (/finalize-feature): Create branch, commit, open PR.

  8. Phase 7 — Summary: Report full lifecycle results.

Each phase pauses for user confirmation before proceeding to the next.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 6ba23d1f85f6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

develop-feature is a command published in the GitHub repository janekbaraniewski/openusage (235 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 248 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.