ios-app-dev-skills: Command for Claude Code

.claude/commands/ios-site-app.md

ios-site-app is a command for Claude Code from JasonColapietro/ios-app-dev-skills. It costs 16 tokens per session (245 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command that creates a plan for turning a website or web app into an iOS app. It examines the site, chooses between web-wrapper and native approaches, and outlines building, testing, and release work.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps assess the URL, users, login, payments, and permissions; plan the iOS implementation; build and test it; prepare screenshots and store information; and report PASS or BLOCK.
Why use it?
It turns a broad website-to-iOS request into a concrete strategy while identifying risks, missing release materials, and blockers before publication.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution.

This is JasonColapietro/ios-app-dev-skills's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on ios-app-dev-skills itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything ios-app-dev-skills configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to JasonColapietro/ios-app-dev-skills. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/JasonColapietro/ios-app-dev-skills/main/.claude/commands/ios-site-app.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JasonColapietro/ios-app-dev-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ios-site-app

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jasoncolapietro/ios-app-dev-skills/ios-site-app/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jasoncolapietro/ios-app-dev-skills/ios-site-app)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jasoncolapietro/ios-app-dev-skills/ios-site-app"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jasoncolapietro/ios-app-dev-skills/ios-site-app/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ios-site-app

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jasoncolapietro/ios-app-dev-skills/ios-site-app"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jasoncolapietro/ios-app-dev-skills/ios-site-app.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 16 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 245 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00016 $0.00245
Opus 5 $0.00008 $0.00122
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00049
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00024

Measured 12d ago against content hash 33a1415b5ff9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ios-site-app scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/ios-site-app.md · 27 lines

What it actually says

/ios-site-app

Input: $ARGUMENTS - URL, app name, existing repo path, or site-to-iOS request.

Use the site-to-ios-app, ios-capacitor-shell, ios-swiftui-product, ios-aso-launch, and ios-app-store-release skills.

Flow

  1. Identify the URL, target user, core job, login, payments, and sensitive permissions.
  2. Run scripts/audit_site_for_ios.py when a URL or HTML file is available.
  3. Fill templates/site-to-ios/SITE_TO_IOS_PLAN.md.
  4. Choose Capacitor remote, Capacitor bundled, native SwiftUI shell, or full native rebuild.
  5. Add native value before treating the app as App Store-ready.
  6. Build and test on simulator or device.
  7. Produce screenshots, metadata, privacy answers, and review notes.
  8. Output PASS/BLOCK. Do not submit publicly without explicit user confirmation.

Output the strategy, artifact paths, build commands, wrapper-risk assessment, and exact remaining blockers.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 27 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 33a1415b5ff9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ios-site-app is a command published in the GitHub repository JasonColapietro/ios-app-dev-skills (4 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 245 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.