Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to JasonColapietro/ios-app-dev-skills. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/JasonColapietro/ios-app-dev-skills/main/.claude/commands/ios-wrapper-risk.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JasonColapietro/ios-app-dev-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jasoncolapietro/ios-app-dev-skills/ios-wrapper-risk)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jasoncolapietro/ios-app-dev-skills/ios-wrapper-risk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jasoncolapietro/ios-app-dev-skills/ios-wrapper-risk/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jasoncolapietro/ios-app-dev-skills/ios-wrapper-risk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jasoncolapietro/ios-app-dev-skills/ios-wrapper-risk.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00168 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00084 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00034 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
ios-wrapper-risk scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/ios-wrapper-risk
Input: $ARGUMENTS - URL, app plan, existing shell, or App Review concern.
Use the site-to-ios-app, ios-capacitor-shell, and ios-swiftui-product
skills.
Grade the App Store 4.2 risk:
- what the app does beyond opening a website;
- native onboarding, settings, support, account deletion, offline, errors, and navigation;
- device features that serve the product instead of decorating it;
- whether payments, auth, or account flows work cleanly on iOS;
- what must be rebuilt before submission.
Output LOW, MEDIUM, or HIGH wrapper risk with concrete fixes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 22 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 5d2eda25ec51
ios-wrapper-risk is a command published in the GitHub repository JasonColapietro/ios-app-dev-skills (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 168 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
preflight
Audit a build against App Review rejection triggers by app type before submitting.
privacy-check
Scan for required-reason API usage and verify PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy completeness before submission.
appstore-review
Run a quick App Store compliance check. Faster than full audit, focuses on most common rejection reasons.
mobile-plan
App Store / Play submission-readiness audit — plan only, no manifest edits until approved.
app-store-audit
Run an enterprise pre submission compliance audit on an iOS or Android app against Apple App Store and Google Play rejection rules. Pass a project path or run from the project root.
rejection-recovery
Diagnose an App Review rejection, draft a Resolution Center response, and plan the fix.