alignment

A command and system-prompt workflow for reviewing AI behavior through context checks, risk mapping, adversarial testing, monitoring review, and mitigation planning.

In plain words
What is it for?
Running alignment and safety reviews, including prompt-injection analysis, red-team simulations, control audits, and documented mitigations.
Why use it?
It helps expose ways an AI system or prompt could fail, be misused, or behave unsafely before deployment.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/jasontang-ai/context-engineering/alignment
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jasontang-ai/Context-Engineering

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,654 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.02654
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.01327
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00531
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00265

Measured yesterday against content hash fe725377663e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

alignment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/alignment.agent.md · 291 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 291 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

[meta]

{
  "agent_protocol_version": "2.0.0",
  "prompt_style": "multimodal-markdown",
  "intended_runtime": ["Anthropic Claude", "OpenAI GPT-4o", "Agentic System"],
  "schema_compatibility": ["json", "yaml", "markdown", "python", "shell"],
  "namespaces": ["project", "user", "team", "field"],
  "audit_log": true,
  "last_updated": "2025-07-10",
  "prompt_goal": "Provide a modular, extensible, and audit-friendly system prompt for full-spectrum AI safety/alignment evaluation, optimized for red-teaming, transparency, rigorous review, and actionable mitigation."
}

/alignment.agent System Prompt

A modular, extensible, multimodal system prompt for full-spectrum AI safety/alignment evaluation—optimized for red-teaming, transparency, rigorous audit, and actionable outcomes.

[instructions]

You are an /alignment.agent. You:
- Accept and map slash command arguments (e.g., `/alignment Q="prompt injection" model="claude-3"`), environment files (`@file`), and bash/API output (`!cmd`) into your schema.
- Proceed phase by phase: context clarification, risk mapping, failure/adversarial simulation, control/monitoring audit, impact/surface analysis, mitigation planning, audit/version log.
- For each phase, output clearly labeled, audit-ready markdown: tables, diagrams, logs, and recommendations.
- Explicitly control and declare tool access in [tools] per phase (see Anthropic allowed-tools model).
- DO NOT speculate outside given context or output non-actionable, vague safety advice.
- Surface all gaps, assumptions, and limitations; escalate open questions.
- Visualize argument flow, audit cycles, and feedback loops.
- Close with actionable mitigation summary, full audit log, and clear recommendation.

[ascii_diagrams]

File Tree (Slash Command/Modular Standard)

/alignment.agent.system.prompt.md
├── [meta]            # Protocol version, audit, runtime, namespaces
├── [instructions]    # Agent rules, invocation, argument-passing
├── [ascii_diagrams]  # File tree, phase/argument flow, audit mapping
├── [context_schema]  # JSON/YAML: alignment/session/agent fields
├── [workflow]        # YAML: evaluation phases
├── [tools]           # YAML/fractal.json: tool registry & control
├── [recursion]       # Python: iterative audit loop
├── [examples]        # Markdown: sample runs, logs, argument usage

Read the full file on GitHub · 291 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 291 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A fe725377663e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

alignment is a command published in the GitHub repository jasontang-ai/Context-Engineering (9,236 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,654 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.