Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/javiermrcom/awesome-claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/javiermrcom/awesome-claude-code/branch-name)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/javiermrcom/awesome-claude-code/branch-name"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/javiermrcom/awesome-claude-code/branch-name/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/javiermrcom/awesome-claude-code/branch-name"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/javiermrcom/awesome-claude-code/branch-name.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00659 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00264 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00132 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
branch-name scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Context
- Current git status: !
/usr/bin/git status --porcelain - Unstaged changes: !
/usr/bin/git diff --stat - Staged changes: !
/usr/bin/git diff --cached --stat - Current branch: !
/usr/bin/git branch --show-current - Recent commits: !
/usr/bin/git log --oneline -5 --pretty=format:"%s" - Git user name: !
/usr/bin/git config user.name
Requirements for branch name suggestions
-
Format
- MUST be:
[type]/{initials}/descriptive-name - Auto-detect developer initials from git config user.name
- Use kebab-case (hyphens) for descriptive part
- MUST be:
-
Developer Initials Detection
- Extract from git config user.name
- Generate initials from full name:
- "Javier Martinez Ruiz" → "jmr" (first letters of each word, lowercase)
- "John Doe" → "jd"
- "Maria Lopez Garcia" → "mlg"
- If name is not available, use git username or fallback to "dev"
-
Branch types
fix: Bug fixesfeat: New featureschore: Maintenance, dependencies, toolingdocs: Documentation only changesrefactor: Code restructuring without behavior changetest: Adding or modifying testsperf: Performance improvementsstyle: Code formatting, no logic changebuild: Build system or external dependenciesci: CI/CD configuration changes
-
Naming rules
- Keep descriptive part concise (2-5 words)
- Use clear, specific terms from the changes
- Match type to primary purpose of changes
- All lowercase, no special characters except hyphens
-
Output requirements
- Provide exactly ONE branch name suggestion
- Choose the most appropriate based on the changes
- No explanations, just the single branch name
Task
Based on the uncommitted changes and git user context above:
- Detect developer initials:
- Parse the git user.name value
- Generate initials from the full name (first letter of each word, lowercase)
- Example: "Javier Martinez Ruiz" → "jmr", "John Doe" → "jd"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 67 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A c1b9686b32af
branch-name is a command published in the GitHub repository javiermrcom/awesome-claude-code (3 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 659 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
release-notes
Generate consistent, well-structured release notes from git history. Triggered on release tags following semver patterns (v..) to produce categorized changelog with breaking changes, features, fixes, and contributor attribution.
commit
A command that examines staged Git changes and proposes a commit message using the Conventional Commits format, such as feat, fix, or docs. Git is a tool for tracking changes to code.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
pr
Handle the full workflow from current branch state to an open, CI-monitored pull request.
codex-review
Use when asked to check, turn on, turn off, or switch this repo's Codex review mode (local, github, or off), or to report the effective mode and Codex sandbox status.