Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jayvee/aigonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jayvee/aigon/aigon-feature-spec-revise)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jayvee/aigon/aigon-feature-spec-revise"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jayvee/aigon/aigon-feature-spec-revise/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jayvee/aigon/aigon-feature-spec-revise"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jayvee/aigon/aigon-feature-spec-revise.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00580 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00232 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00116 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
aigon-feature-spec-revise scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to afsrv — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
aigon-feature-spec-revise
You are the author-side agent. Review all pending spec-review: commits on the feature spec, decide what to keep, and land one acknowledgement commit.
The continuity strategy is selected by Aigon before launch. Do not choose a provider or resume strategy yourself. When resumed, reconcile remembered paths against the current checkout and emit the requested continuation ready/fallback checkpoint before editing.
Resolve the spec
SPEC_PATH=$(aigon feature-spec <name> 2>/dev/null || true)
if [ -z "$SPEC_PATH" ]; then
SPEC_PATH=$(find docs/specs/features -maxdepth 2 \( -name "feature-<name>-*.md" -o -name "feature-<name>.md" \) | head -1)
fi
test -n "$SPEC_PATH" && echo "$SPEC_PATH"
If SPEC_PATH is empty, stop and report that the feature spec could not be resolved.
Find pending review commits
Find the latest acknowledgement, if any:
LAST_ACK=$(git log --follow --format=%H -n 1 --grep='^spec-review-check:' --grep='^spec-revise:' -- "$SPEC_PATH")
echo "last_ack=${LAST_ACK:-none}"
Then inspect pending reviews newer than that acknowledgement:
git log --follow --format='%H %s' -- "$SPEC_PATH"
Pending reviews are commits whose subject starts with spec-review: and are newer than LAST_ACK if LAST_ACK exists.
For every pending review commit:
git show <sha> -- "$SPEC_PATH"
git show -s --format=%B <sha>
Decide in one pass
Process all pending reviewers together. Your options are:
- Accept: keep the reviewed spec as-is.
- Revert: revert one or more review commits.
- Modify: keep the reviewer intent but make follow-up edits before acknowledging.
If you need changes, make them before the acknowledgement commit.
Acknowledge with one commit
After the spec is in its final state, commit exactly once with:
git add "$SPEC_PATH"
git commit --allow-empty -m "spec-revise: feature <name> — <decision summary>" -m "reviewed: <comma-separated reviewer ids>
Decision:
- <accept|revert|modify summary>
Notes:
- <important rationale>"
aigon feature-spec-revise-record <name>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 81 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c5386dc0d828
aigon-feature-spec-revise is a command published in the GitHub repository jayvee/aigon (27 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 580 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to afsrv, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
mach12:issue-implement
Implement a specific stage of an issue's implementation plan.
mach12:gh-issue-read
Read a GitHub issue's title, body, and all comments; optionally locate an HTML-marker comment.
mach12:gh-assign
Assign the current user to one or more GitHub issues, handling existing assignees.
mach12:gh-sub-issues
Detect sub-issues of a GitHub issue using the two-strategy approach (API, then body-parse).
mach12:plan-comment-contract
Apply the canonical contract for a durable implementation-plan comment.
mach12:issue-create
Create a structured GitHub issue from current context or description.