test

test is a command for Claude Code from jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit. It costs 15 tokens per session (269 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A command for planning or running focused tests for a coding task, bug, or code change. TDD means writing a test to describe expected behaviour before implementing the change.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to reproduce bugs, add behaviour-focused tests, run narrow validation, and report results, changes, risks, and remaining coverage.
Why use it?
It provides a defined validation process, reducing the chance of claiming a fix without evidence or adding tests that only check internal implementation details.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution. Also seen: agent in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it to reproduce bugs, add behaviour-focused tests, run narrow validation, and report results, changes, risks, and remaining coverage.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit/test
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for test

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit/test/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit/test)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit/test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for test

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit/test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 15 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 269 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00015 $0.00269
Opus 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00108
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00054
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00027

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 858925f9c0f3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

opencode/commands/test.md · 41 lines

What it actually says

Test objective:

$ARGUMENTS

Use the matching local skills:

  • test-driven-development for behavior changes, bugs, or new tests.
  • debugging-and-error-recovery when there is a failure, trace, or unexpected behavior.

Flow:

  1. Identify expected behavior, scope, and success criteria.
  2. For bugs, reproduce first with a test or observable evidence.
  3. Add or adjust the minimum test that proves the behavior.
  4. Run the narrowest useful validation.
  5. If implementation is needed to make the test pass and scope is clear, implement the minimum code required.
  6. Run final reasonable validation and summarize the evidence.

Rules:

  • Do not replace /feature when spec, research, or scope decisions are missing.
  • Do not write tests that only verify fragile internals.
  • Do not claim success for a reproducible bug unless you saw the new test fail, unless you explain why that was not viable.
  • Do not expand refactors beyond the tested behavior.

Deliver:

  1. Test or validation added.
  2. Before/after result when applicable.
  3. Implementation changes, if any.
  4. Commands run.
  5. Risks or pending coverage.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 41 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 858925f9c0f3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

test is a command published in the GitHub repository jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit (136 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 269 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.