Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jeffh/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jeffh/claude-plugins/local_review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jeffh/claude-plugins/local_review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jeffh/claude-plugins/local_review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jeffh/claude-plugins/local_review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jeffh/claude-plugins/local_review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00455 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00182 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
local_review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Local Review
You are tasked with setting up a local review environment for a colleague's branch. This involves creating a worktree, setting up dependencies, and launching a new Claude Code session.
Process
When invoked with a parameter like gh_username:branchName:
-
Parse the input:
- Extract GitHub username and branch name from the format
username:branchname - If no parameter provided, ask for it in the format:
gh_username:branchName
- Extract GitHub username and branch name from the format
-
Extract ticket information:
- Look for ticket numbers in the branch name (e.g.,
eng-1696,ENG-1696) - Use this to create a short worktree directory name
- If no ticket found, use a sanitized version of the branch name
- Look for ticket numbers in the branch name (e.g.,
-
Set up the remote and worktree:
- Check if the remote already exists using
git remote -v - If not, add it:
git remote add USERNAME [email protected]:USERNAME/humanlayer - Fetch from the remote:
git fetch USERNAME - Create worktree:
git worktree add -b BRANCHNAME ~/wt/humanlayer/SHORT_NAME USERNAME/BRANCHNAME
- Check if the remote already exists using
-
Configure the worktree:
- Copy Claude settings:
cp .claude/settings.local.json WORKTREE/.claude/ - Run setup:
make -C WORKTREE setup - Initialize thoughts:
cd WORKTREE && humanlayer thoughts init --directory humanlayer
- Copy Claude settings:
Error Handling
- If worktree already exists, inform the user they need to remove it first
- If remote fetch fails, check if the username/repo exists
- If setup fails, provide the error but continue with the launch
Example Usage
/local_review samdickson22:sam/eng-1696-hotkey-for-yolo-mode
This will:
- Add 'samdickson22' as a remote
- Create worktree at
~/wt/humanlayer/eng-1696 - Set up the environment
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 49 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 8bf3baec3e8f
local_review is a command published in the GitHub repository jeffh/claude-plugins (12 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 455 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
speckit.spex.submit
Push and create PR for team review, with optional watch mode for CI monitoring.
git
The pre-finish status: branch, hygiene findings, message checks, workflow lint, template state.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
release-tag
Create and push a version tag after a release PR has been merged.
factory
Linha de montagem multi-agente (Software Factory) — spec-writer → builder em worktree isolado → 4 revisores paralelos (Security, Code, UI, UX) → approver com gate de risco e dashboard visual.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.