Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jellydn/my-ai-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jellydn/my-ai-tools/simplify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jellydn/my-ai-tools/simplify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jellydn/my-ai-tools/simplify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jellydn/my-ai-tools/simplify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jellydn/my-ai-tools/simplify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00148 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00059 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00030 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
simplify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Simplify $ARGUMENTS, or the files from git diff --name-only when no scope is given. Preserve behavior and public APIs.
Review the full scope before editing:
- Reuse: remove duplication and use existing canonical helpers.
- Quality: improve unclear names, deep nesting, mixed responsibilities, and inconsistent local style.
- Efficiency: remove N+1 work, redundant loops, repeated expensive operations, and unused computation.
Apply only clear improvements. Do not change useful business or architecture comments, established shared abstractions, standard error handling, or public API boundaries.
Finish when all actionable findings are applied and the relevant build, tests, and checks pass.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -11 lines · -13 tokens per session cb5afdf6dbf2
- 1mo ago First seen · 27 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 52bb9bdf5cf7
simplify is a command published in the GitHub repository jellydn/my-ai-tools (124 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 148 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
critique
Design lens critique covering visual hierarchy, clarity, and anti-slop patterns — produces a findings table, no code edits unless asked. Use when the user wants a design review, says "what's wrong with this UI", or needs a second opinion before a handoff or presentation.
devkit.github.review-pr
Provides comprehensive GitHub pull request review with code quality, security, and best practices analysis. Use when reviewing a PR before merging.
devkit.react.code-review
Provides comprehensive React 19 + Tailwind CSS code review focusing on modern patterns, hooks, Server Components, Actions, performance, accessibility, and Tailwind best practices. Use when reviewing React code changes or before merging pull requests.
fix-comments
Address PR review comments by implementing requested changes automatically.
review-open-prs
Command "review-open-prs" from The-Artificer-of-Ciphers-LLC/skills-from-the-artificer, covering batch pr review directive — all open prs i did not author, phase a — enumerate target prs & build the queue, phase b — per-pr directive (runs once per queued $pr), 0. context anchoring and 1. preconditions.
branch-review
Review a branch before merge.