eval

eval is a command for Claude Code from JeremyDev87/codingbuddy. It costs 0 tokens per session (3,237 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review command that examines code quality and suggests improvements. It can also challenge agreeable conclusions and examine wider effects of proposed changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after coding when you want an evaluation of quality, security, accessibility, performance, or other review concerns. Type EVAL or EVALUATE to start it.
Why use it?
It helps find weaknesses and missed consequences after implementation, so improvement does not depend only on the developer’s first review.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: mentions Cursor.

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is Legacy bare `/eval` is deprecated. See [Migration Guide](../docs/migration-guide.md)..

Part of the codingbuddy plugin — 6 commands, 4 hooks, 1 MCP server shipped together

Good fit Use it after coding when you want an evaluation of quality, security, accessibility, performance, or other review concerns. Type EVAL or EVALUATE to start it.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JeremyDev87/codingbuddy
agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/eval

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install codingbuddy, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 commands, 4 hooks, 1 MCP server.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for eval

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/eval/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/eval)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/eval/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for eval

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/eval.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,237 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.03237
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.01295
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00647
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00324

Measured 1mo ago against content hash b9b70f590b77, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

eval scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

packages/claude-code-plugin/commands/eval.md · 342 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 342 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

EVAL Mode

Purpose

Evaluate code quality and suggest improvements

Mode Availability

Standalone Mode (no MCP server)

This command works without the CodingBuddy MCP server. In standalone mode, you get:

  • Mode detection and transition
  • Code quality evaluation
  • Anti-sycophancy analysis
  • Devil's Advocate and Impact Radius analysis

MCP Enhanced Mode

With the CodingBuddy MCP server connected, you additionally get:

  • parse_mode with full context tracking
  • Specialist agent dispatch for comprehensive evaluation
  • Contextual checklists (security, accessibility, performance)
  • Cross-session context persistence

Activation

Invoke via /codingbuddy:eval (namespaced) or the EVAL keyword.

Legacy bare /eval is deprecated. See Migration Guide.

This command activates EVAL mode for the CodingBuddy workflow.

Instructions

Important:

  • EVAL mode is not automatic after ACT
  • User must explicitly request EVAL by typing EVAL
  • Default behavior after ACT: Return to PLAN (without evaluation)
  • Use EVAL when you want iterative improvement and refinement

Trigger:

  • Type EVAL after completing ACT
  • Type EVALUATE (also accepted)
  • Korean: 평가해 or 개선안 제시해

🔴 Agent Activation (STRICT):

  • When EVAL is triggered, Code Reviewer Agent (loaded via parse_mode in MCP mode; defaults in standalone mode) MUST be automatically activated
  • The Agent's evaluation framework and all mandatory requirements MUST be followed
  • See agent documentation for complete evaluation framework

Purpose: Self-improvement through iterative refinement

What EVAL does (with Code Reviewer Agent):

  1. Analyze Implementation (via Code Reviewer Agent)

    • Review what was done in ACT
    • Check adherence to project rules
    • Verify quality standards met
    • 🔴 Required: Follow Code Reviewer Agent's evaluation framework
  2. Assess Quality (via Code Reviewer Agent mandatory perspectives)

    • 🔴 Code quality (SOLID, DRY, complexity)
      • Required: When evaluating code quality, reference Code Quality Specialist Agent (dispatched via parse_mode in MCP mode) modes.evaluation framework for SOLID principles, DRY, complexity analysis, and design patterns assessment
    • 🔴 Architecture (layer boundaries, dependency direction, type safety)
      • Required: When evaluating architecture, reference Architecture Specialist Agent (dispatched via parse_mode in MCP mode) framework for layer boundaries, dependency direction, and type safety assessment
    • 🔴 Test coverage (90%+ goal)
      • Required: When evaluating tests, reference Test Strategy Specialist Agent (dispatched via parse_mode in MCP mode) modes.evaluation framework for test coverage, TDD workflow, and test quality assessment
    • 🔴 Performance (build size, execution optimization)
      • Required: When evaluating performance, reference Performance Specialist Agent (dispatched via parse_mode in MCP mode) framework for build size, execution optimization, and performance metrics assessment
    • 🔴 Security (XSS/CSRF, authentication/authorization)
      • Required: When evaluating security, reference Security Specialist Agent (dispatched via parse_mode in MCP mode) framework for OAuth 2.0, JWT, CSRF/XSS protection assessment
    • 🔴 Accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA compliance)
      • Required: When evaluating accessibility, reference Accessibility Specialist Agent (dispatched via parse_mode in MCP mode) framework for WCAG 2.1 AA compliance verification
    • 🔴 SEO (metadata, structured data)
      • Required: When evaluating SEO, reference SEO Specialist Agent (dispatched via parse_mode in MCP mode) framework for metadata, structured data, and search engine optimization assessment
    • 🔴 UI/UX Design (visual hierarchy, UX patterns)
      • Required: When evaluating UI/UX design, reference UI/UX Designer Agent (dispatched via parse_mode in MCP mode) framework for visual hierarchy, UX laws, and interaction patterns assessment
    • 🔴 Documentation Quality (documentation, cursor rules, AI prompts)
      • Required: When evaluating documentation, cursor rules, or AI prompts, reference Documentation Specialist Agent (dispatched via parse_mode in MCP mode) modes.evaluation framework for clarity, completeness, consistency, actionability, structure, and references assessment

Read the full file on GitHub · 342 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 342 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b9b70f590b77

Subscribe to this mod's changes

eval is a command published in the GitHub repository JeremyDev87/codingbuddy (31 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,237 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.