Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jewgah/claude-code-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jewgah/claude-code-skills/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jewgah/claude-code-skills/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jewgah/claude-code-skills/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jewgah/claude-code-skills/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jewgah/claude-code-skills/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00125 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00063 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00025 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Dispatch the reviewer agent on the current change. If $ARGUMENTS is given, restrict the review to that path/scope; otherwise review the whole diff (git diff + git diff --staged).
If this project has dedicated review skills ({{REVIEW_SKILLS}}), prefer running those.
Return findings grouped CRITICAL / WARNING / INFO with path:line and concrete fixes. Do not apply changes unless I ask.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 11 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 68843cf2c8b2
review is a command published in the GitHub repository Jewgah/claude-code-skills (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 125 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
devkit.github.review-pr
Provides comprehensive GitHub pull request review with code quality, security, and best practices analysis. Use when reviewing a PR before merging.
critique
Design lens critique covering visual hierarchy, clarity, and anti-slop patterns — produces a findings table, no code edits unless asked. Use when the user wants a design review, says "what's wrong with this UI", or needs a second opinion before a handoff or presentation.
pm-review
Review local git diff with reasoning + snippets; cross-check; dispose findings into the rules library.
fix-comments
Address PR review comments by implementing requested changes automatically.
branch-review
Review a branch before merge [target] [level].
review
Perform a thorough code review of the current uncommitted changes or a specified file/directory.