google-apps-script

google-apps-script is a command for coding agents from jezweb/claude-skills. It costs 5 tokens per session (54 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command for creating Google Apps Script automations. Google Apps Script is Google's code-based tool for automating Sheets and other Workspace apps.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when you want to automate a Google Sheet or another Google Workspace task.
Why use it?
It helps turn a described spreadsheet or Workspace task into an automation instead of doing the work by hand.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/jezweb/claude-skills/google-apps-script
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jezweb/claude-skills

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for google-apps-script

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jezweb/claude-skills/google-apps-script.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jezweb/claude-skills/google-apps-script)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jezweb/claude-skills/google-apps-script"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jezweb/claude-skills/google-apps-script.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 5 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 54 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00005 $0.00054
Opus 5 $0.00003 $0.00027
Sonnet 5 $0.00001 $0.00011
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00005

Measured yesterday against content hash f163eb7873be, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

google-apps-script scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/integrations/commands/google-apps-script.md · 9 lines

What it actually says

Load the google-apps-script skill.

If $ARGUMENTS contains a spreadsheet URL or project name, use it. Otherwise ask what to automate.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 9 lines · 5 tokens per session scan A f163eb7873be

Subscribe to this mod's changes

google-apps-script is a command published in the GitHub repository jezweb/claude-skills (993 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 5 tokens to every session and 54 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.