Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jghiringhelli/codeseekerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jghiringhelli/codeseeker/standards)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jghiringhelli/codeseeker/standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jghiringhelli/codeseeker/standards/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jghiringhelli/codeseeker/standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jghiringhelli/codeseeker/standards.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00327 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00131 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
standards scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Get Coding Standards
Retrieve the coding patterns CodeSeeker auto-detected from this project.
Arguments:
$ARGUMENTS- Optional category filter:validation,error-handling,logging,testing, orall
What this does:
- Returns patterns detected by scanning the indexed codebase
- Shows each preferred pattern with usage count and confidence
- Lists alternatives with a recommendation
Instructions for Claude:
CodeSeeker exposes a single MCP tool, mcp__codeseeker__codeseeker, routed by action.
-
Call it with:
{ "action": "analyze", "project": "<absolute path of the project root>", "analyze": { "kind": "standards", "category": "$ARGUMENTS" } }Use
"all"when no category is given.projectis required for everyanalyzecall. -
Present, per category: the preferred pattern, its usage count and confidence, the import statement, and any alternatives.
-
Apply these when writing new code so it matches existing conventions instead of introducing a new style.
Caveat: standards are derived from indexed chunks, which include Markdown and test fixtures. Treat a pattern whose cited files are documentation rather than source as weak evidence, and say so rather than adopting it.
If MCP tools are not available, read the generated file directly:
cat .codeseeker/coding-standards.json
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +8 lines 269992800015
- 1mo ago First seen · 33 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A bdadfef3dd2f
standards is a command published in the GitHub repository jghiringhelli/codeseeker (20 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 327 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
api-mock
Build realistic API mock servers with request stubbing, dynamic data, test scenarios, and contract testing.
cost-optimize
Reduce cloud costs across AWS, Azure, and GCP through rightsizing, reserved and spot capacity, storage tuning, and cost monitoring.
performance-optimization
Orchestrate end-to-end application performance optimization from profiling to monitoring.
refactor-clean
Refactor provided code for cleanliness, maintainability, and alignment with SOLID principles and modern best practices — no over-engineering.
deps-audit
Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.
data-driven-feature
Build features guided by data insights, A/B testing, and continuous measurement.