Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jinghao67/conductorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jinghao67/conductor/cd-branch)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jinghao67/conductor/cd-branch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jinghao67/conductor/cd-branch/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jinghao67/conductor/cd-branch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jinghao67/conductor/cd-branch.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00719 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00288 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00144 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
cd-branch scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Existing branches and waves (for picking the next id and placing the wave):
!jq -r '{next_index:( ([.branches|keys[]|sub("CD-";"")|tonumber]|max // 0) + 1 ), branches:[.branches|to_entries[]|{id:.key,status:.value.status,wave:.value.execution_wave,depends_on:.value.depends_on}], waves:.waves}' .conductor/registry.json 2>/dev/null || echo "No .conductor — run /cd-init first."
Request: $ARGUMENTS
Do this:
- Judge the wave and dependencies (this is your job, not a hook's): is this branch
ready_parallel(runs now from the current snapshot) ordependent(needs another branch's output first)? Respect the active interactive-branch budget (max 2). If dependencies are ambiguous, ask the user before creating the card. - Choose the next id
CD-NNNfromnext_indexabove. Build the stable title[CD-NNN][W<wave>][<role>] <short purpose>. - Append the branch to
.conductor/registry.jsonunder.branches["CD-NNN"]with this shape (statusbrief_ready):
Also add/extend the relevant{"title":"<title>","stable_title":"[CD-NNN][W<wave>][<role>] <short>","type":"branch","role":"<role>","status":"brief_ready","execution_wave":<n>,"depends_on":[],"unblocks":[],"start_policy":"current_wave_only","gate_condition":"completion_report_ready","merge_policy":"explicit_user_confirm","based_on_snapshot_id":null,"brief_version":1,"stale":false,"brief_path":".conductor/branches/CD-NNN/brief.md","report_path":".conductor/branches/CD-NNN/completion-report.md","bound_session_id":null}.waves[]entry. (The branch-map.md re-renders automatically.) - Write
.conductor/branches/CD-NNN/brief.md— the ONLY context the branch will receive:# Branch CD-NNN — <title> ## Purpose Card You are branch CD-NNN: <title> Purpose: <one precise outcome> Not for: <out of scope> Input: master snapshot <id>; approved summaries only Output: completion-report.md Return to master when: output is ready and the user confirms completion ## In scope / Out of scope ## Allowed context (this brief + listed files only) ## Completion criteria ## Global-decision rule If you make/imply a decision affecting other branches, scope, naming, or goals, record it under "Proposed Global Decisions" in the completion report; it is not binding until the master confirms it. - Do NOT open a session. Tell the user: review the card, then
/cd-enter CD-NNNto start the branch in a new tab.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A d24eb216cc4d
cd-branch is a command published in the GitHub repository Jinghao67/conductor (99 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 719 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
project
Manage projects: register repos, inspect, configure per-project settings, and remove.
land
Resolve and squash merge one named, currently authorized pull request.
standup
Review my git commits from the past workday and generate a standup summary.
repo-architect
Repository structure optimization and multi-repo management with ruv-swarm coordination for scalable project architecture and development workflows.
sync
Synchronizes your local swarm state with the latest GitHub repository state, updating task statuses and detecting changes.
claim
Claims a GitHub issue for your swarm to work on, preventing conflicts with other swarms.