Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to jmanhype/speckit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmanhype/speckit/main/.claude/commands/speckit-orchestrate.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmanhype/speckitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jmanhype/speckit/speckit-orchestrate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jmanhype/speckit/speckit-orchestrate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jmanhype/speckit/speckit-orchestrate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jmanhype/speckit/speckit-orchestrate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jmanhype/speckit/speckit-orchestrate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00745 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00298 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
speckit-orchestrate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Speckit Orchestrate (Basic)
Purpose
Guide the agent to (optionally) refine the brief via TCHES' metaprompt, then run Spec Kit's passes end-to-end via SlashCommand.
Objective
Turn "$ARGUMENTS" into an executed, spec-driven change:
- (if
--metapresent and available) run TCHES'/create-meta-prompt - run the Spec Kit passes: specify → plan → tasks → implement
- summarize artifacts, diffs, and verification status
Inputs
$ARGUMENTS= brief + optional flags:--metaUse TCHES metaprompt to refine the brief before starting--parallelPrefer parallel execution during implement where deps allow
Flow
1. Optional Meta-Prompting (if --meta flag present)
- Check if
/create-meta-promptcommand exists - If exists and
--metaflag present:- Run:
/create-meta-prompt $ARGUMENTS - Use its outputs (users, outcomes, constraints) to enrich the spec phase
- Run:
- If not exists, skip and proceed to Specify
2. Specify (WHAT/WHY)
- Run:
/speckit.specify $ARGUMENTS- (fallback if not found)
/specify $ARGUMENTS
- Keep tech decisions out of the spec
3. Plan (HOW)
- Run:
/speckit.planDraft a technical plan aligned to the spec: architecture, data model, interfaces, testing, observability, performance budgets, risks.- (fallback)
/plan
4. Tasks (make it executable)
- Run:
/speckit.tasks- (fallback)
/tasks
- Require small, verifiable tasks with dependencies, Definition of Done, and verification steps
- Note: In this streamlined workflow, analyze phase is skipped. For consistency validation, use
/speckit-workflow-v2or run/speckit.analyzemanually before implementation.
5. Implement (do the work)
- Run:
/speckit.implement- (fallback)
/implement
- If
--parallelpresent, request parallelization where dependencies allow
6. Report
- Emit a concise summary:
- Phases executed
- Artifacts created/changed
- Outstanding TODOs
- Verification status
Notes
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 86 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 6f9a0cb3f85e
speckit-orchestrate is a command published in the GitHub repository jmanhype/speckit (26 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 745 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other commands, from other repositories
lavra-work-teams
Work on multiple beads with persistent worker teammates that self-organize through a ready queue.
lavra-retro
Weekly retrospective with shipping analytics, team performance, and knowledge synthesis.
lavra-ship
Fully automated ship sequence from code-ready to PR-open with beads closed and knowledge captured.
lavra-work-ralph
Autonomous retry mode for bead work -- iterates until completion criteria are met or retry budget is exhausted.
lavra-import
Import a markdown plan into beads as an epic with child tasks.
lavra-quick
Fast-track small tasks — abbreviated plan then straight to execution.