Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to jnarowski/agentcmd. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jnarowski/agentcmd/main/.claude/commands/implement-pr-feedback.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jnarowski/agentcmdWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jnarowski/agentcmd/implement-pr-feedback)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jnarowski/agentcmd/implement-pr-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jnarowski/agentcmd/implement-pr-feedback/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jnarowski/agentcmd/implement-pr-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jnarowski/agentcmd/implement-pr-feedback.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.01535 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00614 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00307 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00153 |
Grade A, and why
implement-pr-feedback scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 223 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implement PR Feedback
Atomic operation: fetch PR comments → analyze → implement → commit → reply to each thread → auto-resolve.
Variables
- $pr-number: $1 (optional) - PR number (defaults to current branch PR)
Instructions
CRITICAL:
- NEVER skip git hooks (no --no-verify)
- Use HEREDOC for commit message with Claude footer
- Check if changes exist before committing
- Reply to EACH comment thread individually BEFORE resolving
- Skip resolve gracefully if permission denied
- Don't implement outdated comments without user confirmation
- NEVER run additional commands beyond git/gh operations
- NEVER use TodoWrite or Task tools
Workflow
1. Detect PR Number and Repo Info
Run these commands in parallel:
# Get PR number if not provided
gh pr view --json number -q .number
# Get repo owner and name for GraphQL API
gh repo view --json owner,name -q '"\(.owner.login)/\(.name)"'
If no PR found and $pr-number not provided, stop with error: "No PR found for current branch. Please provide PR number."
2. Fetch PR Comments and Reviews
gh pr view $PR_NUMBER --json reviews,reviewThreads
This returns JSON with:
reviews: Array of review objects withstate(APPROVED, CHANGES_REQUESTED, COMMENTED),body,authorreviewThreads: Array of thread objects withisResolved,isOutdated,comments(array withbody,path,line,id,author)
3. Parse and Display Structured Analysis
Parse the JSON to extract actionable comments. Filter and classify:
Filter criteria (actionable comments):
isResolved === falseisOutdated === false- NOT just approval/LGTM comments
Priority classification (based on keywords in comment body):
- High: Review state is
CHANGES_REQUESTED, or body contains "must", "required", "blocking", "needs", "have to" - Medium: Body contains "should", "consider", "suggest", "recommend", "could you", "please"
- Low: Body contains "?", "why", "how come", "curious"
Display structured analysis like this:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 223 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 20d57fdce0aa
implement-pr-feedback is a command published in the GitHub repository jnarowski/agentcmd (18 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 1,535 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
implement-pr-feedback compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| implement-pr-feedbackjnarowski/agentcmd | Command | 18 | 10mo ago | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| elegant-code-reviewathola/claude-night-market | Command | 348 | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| prp-commitFmarzochi/EGC | Command | 68 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 15 | Claude Code |
| gsd:pr-branchkryptobaseddev/cleo | Command | 160 | yesterday | MIT | A | 24 | Claude Code |
| validate-pr-descriptionrjmurillo/ai-agents | Command | 49 | yesterday | MIT | A | 22 | Claude Code |
| gitazrtydxb/procoder | Command | 211 | 11d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 20 | Claude Code |
| karpathy-checkricneves-ai/flowgrammers-skills | Command | 117 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |